Leach v. Carlile
E934448
Leach v. Carlile is a United States Supreme Court decision issued during Chief Justice Edward Douglass White’s tenure, addressing questions of federal law under the early 20th-century Court.
All labels observed (1)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| Leach v. Carlile canonical | 1 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T11576369 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Leach v. Carlile Context triple: [United States Supreme Court cases of the White Court, hasNotableCase, Leach v. Carlile]
-
A.
Briggs v. Elliott
Briggs v. Elliott was a landmark federal court case from South Carolina challenging racial segregation in public schools, and it became one of the key cases consolidated into Brown v. Board of Education.
-
B.
Lucas v. Earl
Lucas v. Earl is a landmark 1930 U.S. Supreme Court tax law case that established the principle that income is taxed to the person who earns it, regardless of contractual arrangements to split or assign that income.
-
C.
Luther v. Borden
Luther v. Borden is an 1849 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the "political question" doctrine by holding that the determination of a state's legitimate government under the Constitution’s Guarantee Clause is a matter for Congress, not the courts.
-
D.
Ogden v. Saunders
Ogden v. Saunders is an 1827 U.S. Supreme Court case, known for Justice Bushrod Washington’s opinion addressing the constitutionality of state bankruptcy laws under the Contract Clause.
-
E.
Collin v. Smith
Collin v. Smith is a U.S. federal court case that addressed the constitutionality of local ordinances restricting a planned Nazi march in Skokie, Illinois, ultimately affirming strong First Amendment protections for offensive political speech.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Leach v. Carlile Target entity description: Leach v. Carlile is a United States Supreme Court decision issued during Chief Justice Edward Douglass White’s tenure, addressing questions of federal law under the early 20th-century Court.
-
A.
Briggs v. Elliott
Briggs v. Elliott was a landmark federal court case from South Carolina challenging racial segregation in public schools, and it became one of the key cases consolidated into Brown v. Board of Education.
-
B.
Lucas v. Earl
Lucas v. Earl is a landmark 1930 U.S. Supreme Court tax law case that established the principle that income is taxed to the person who earns it, regardless of contractual arrangements to split or assign that income.
-
C.
Luther v. Borden
Luther v. Borden is an 1849 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the "political question" doctrine by holding that the determination of a state's legitimate government under the Constitution’s Guarantee Clause is a matter for Congress, not the courts.
-
D.
Ogden v. Saunders
Ogden v. Saunders is an 1827 U.S. Supreme Court case, known for Justice Bushrod Washington’s opinion addressing the constitutionality of state bankruptcy laws under the Contract Clause.
-
E.
Collin v. Smith
Collin v. Smith is a U.S. federal court case that addressed the constitutionality of local ordinances restricting a planned Nazi march in Skokie, Illinois, ultimately affirming strong First Amendment protections for offensive political speech.
- F. None of above. chosen
Statements (26)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf |
United States Supreme Court case
ⓘ
court decision ⓘ federal case ⓘ |
| appliesToJurisdiction |
United States federal courts
ⓘ
linked to:
U.S. federal courts
|
| authority | binding precedent within the federal judiciary ⓘ |
| branchOfGovernment | judicial branch of the United States ⓘ |
| chiefJustice | Edward Douglass White ⓘ |
| citationForm | case name format "Leach v. Carlile" ⓘ |
| country |
United States
ⓘ
linked to:
United States of America
|
| court | Supreme Court of the United States ⓘ |
| decisionBy | United States Supreme Court justices sitting en banc ⓘ |
| decisionType | opinion of the Court ⓘ |
| era | White Court ⓘ |
| jurisdiction | federal law ⓘ |
| language | English ⓘ |
| legalEffect |
interprets federal law
ⓘ
serves as precedent for later cases involving similar federal questions ⓘ |
| legalSystem | common law ⓘ |
| namedAfter |
Carlile
ⓘ
Leach ⓘ |
| party |
Carlile
ⓘ
Leach ⓘ |
| subjectMatter |
United States constitutional framework
ⓘ
federal law ⓘ statutory interpretation ⓘ |
| timePeriod | early 20th century ⓘ |
How these facts were elicited
The pipeline generated the facts above by prompting gpt-5.1 with this entity's name + description and the instruction below.
Instruction
You are a knowledge base construction expert. Given a subject entity and a description of it, return factual statements that you know for the subject as a JSON list of dictionaries(triples), where keys must be "subject", "predicate" and "object". The number of facts may be very high, between 25 to 50 or more, for very popular subjects. For less popular subjects, the number of facts can be very low, like 5 or 10. # Requirements - If you don't know the subject at all, return an empty list. - If the subject is not a named entity, return an empty list. - Include at least one triple where predicate is "instanceOf". - Do not get too wordy. - Separate several objects into multiple triples with one object.
Input
Subject: Leach v. Carlile Description of subject: Leach v. Carlile is a United States Supreme Court decision issued during Chief Justice Edward Douglass White’s tenure, addressing questions of federal law under the early 20th-century Court.
Referenced by (1)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.