Center for Scientific Review
E8253
The Center for Scientific Review is the National Institutes of Health component responsible for overseeing the peer review of most grant applications to ensure scientific merit and integrity in funding decisions.
All labels observed (1)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| Center for Scientific Review canonical | 2 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T77703 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
Target entity: Center for Scientific Review Context triple: [National Institutes of Health, hasPart, Center for Scientific Review]
-
A.
Office of Research and Development
The Office of Research and Development is a specialized unit focused on planning, funding, and overseeing scientific and technological research initiatives within its parent organization.
-
B.
National Institutes of Health
The National Institutes of Health is the United States’ primary federal biomedical research agency, supporting and conducting medical research to improve public health.
-
C.
Fogarty International Center
Fogarty International Center is a division of the U.S. National Institutes of Health that supports and advances global health research and training, particularly in low- and middle-income countries.
-
D.
National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering
The National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering is a U.S. federal research institute that advances the development and application of biomedical imaging and bioengineering technologies to improve health.
-
E.
National Science Foundation
The National Science Foundation is an independent U.S. government agency that funds and promotes fundamental research and education in all non-medical fields of science and engineering.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Target entity: Center for Scientific Review Target entity description: The Center for Scientific Review is the National Institutes of Health component responsible for overseeing the peer review of most grant applications to ensure scientific merit and integrity in funding decisions.
-
A.
Office of Research and Development
The Office of Research and Development is a specialized unit focused on planning, funding, and overseeing scientific and technological research initiatives within its parent organization.
-
B.
National Institutes of Health
The National Institutes of Health is the United States’ primary federal biomedical research agency, supporting and conducting medical research to improve public health.
-
C.
Fogarty International Center
Fogarty International Center is a division of the U.S. National Institutes of Health that supports and advances global health research and training, particularly in low- and middle-income countries.
-
D.
National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering
The National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering is a U.S. federal research institute that advances the development and application of biomedical imaging and bioengineering technologies to improve health.
-
E.
National Science Foundation
The National Science Foundation is an independent U.S. government agency that funds and promotes fundamental research and education in all non-medical fields of science and engineering.
- F. None of above. chosen
Statements (46)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf |
center of the National Institutes of Health
ⓘ
federal government agency component ⓘ |
| alsoKnownAs | CSR ⓘ |
| collaboratesWith | other NIH institutes and centers ⓘ |
| country |
United States of America
ⓘ
surface form:
United States
|
| employs |
administrative staff
ⓘ
scientific review officers ⓘ |
| ensures |
compliance with NIH peer review regulations
ⓘ
confidentiality of grant applications during review ⓘ conflict of interest management in peer review ⓘ transparency in NIH peer review ⓘ |
| establishedBy | National Institutes of Health ⓘ |
| field |
biomedical research
ⓘ
health sciences ⓘ |
| focusesOn |
scientific merit of proposed research
ⓘ
significance and innovation of proposed research ⓘ technical feasibility of proposed research ⓘ |
| goal | to identify the most promising and meritorious research for NIH funding ⓘ |
| hasAbbreviation | CSR ⓘ |
| headquartersLocation | Bethesda, Maryland ⓘ |
| jurisdiction |
United States government
ⓘ
surface form:
federal government of the United States
|
| language | English ⓘ |
| locatedIn |
Bethesda, Maryland
ⓘ
Maryland ⓘ United States of America ⓘ
surface form:
United States
|
| mission | to ensure that NIH grant applications receive fair, independent, expert, and timely scientific review ⓘ |
| operatesWithin |
National Institutes of Health
ⓘ
surface form:
NIH extramural research program
|
| organizes |
scientific review groups
ⓘ
study sections ⓘ |
| overseenBy |
United States Department of Health and Human Services
ⓘ
surface form:
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
|
| parentOrganization | National Institutes of Health ⓘ |
| partOf | National Institutes of Health ⓘ |
| primaryFunction | oversee peer review of NIH grant applications ⓘ |
| regulatesProcess | NIH peer review policies and procedures ⓘ |
| responsibleFor |
ensuring integrity in NIH funding decisions
ⓘ
ensuring scientific merit in NIH funding decisions ⓘ initial scientific and technical merit review of most NIH grant applications ⓘ |
| reviews |
career development award applications
ⓘ
fellowship applications ⓘ research project grant applications ⓘ small business grant applications ⓘ |
| sector | public sector ⓘ |
| servesCommunity | biomedical research community ⓘ |
| usesProcess | peer review ⓘ |
| website | https://public.csr.nih.gov ⓘ |
| worksWith | scientific and technical experts as peer reviewers ⓘ |
How these facts were elicited
The pipeline generated the facts above by prompting gpt-5.1 with this entity's name + description and the instruction below.
You are a knowledge base construction expert. Given a subject entity and a description of it, return factual statements that you know for the subject as a JSON list of dictionaries(triples), where keys must be "subject", "predicate" and "object". The number of facts may be very high, between 25 to 50 or more, for very popular subjects. For less popular subjects, the number of facts can be very low, like 5 or 10. # Requirements - If you don't know the subject at all, return an empty list. - If the subject is not a named entity, return an empty list. - Include at least one triple where predicate is "instanceOf". - Do not get too wordy. - Separate several objects into multiple triples with one object.
Subject: Center for Scientific Review Description of subject: The Center for Scientific Review is the National Institutes of Health component responsible for overseeing the peer review of most grant applications to ensure scientific merit and integrity in funding decisions.
Referenced by (2)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.