ICTR Appeals Chamber
E808291
The ICTR Appeals Chamber was the highest judicial body of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, responsible for hearing appeals against trial judgments in cases concerning the 1994 Rwandan genocide.
All labels observed (3)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| Appeals Chamber of the ICTR | 3 |
| ICTR Appeals Chamber canonical | 3 |
| Appeals Chamber (ICTR) | 1 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T9554377 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
Target entity: ICTR Appeals Chamber Context triple: [Prosecutor v. Jean Kambanda, appealHeardBy, ICTR Appeals Chamber]
-
A.
ICTR Trial Chamber I
ICTR Trial Chamber I was a judicial division of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda responsible for hearing and adjudicating cases related to the 1994 Rwandan genocide.
-
B.
Trial Chamber I of the ICTR
Trial Chamber I of the ICTR was one of the first-instance judicial divisions of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, responsible for hearing and deciding genocide and crimes against humanity cases, including the landmark Akayesu trial.
-
C.
Appeals Chamber of the ICTY
The Appeals Chamber of the ICTY was the judicial body of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia responsible for hearing and deciding appeals from its trial judgments and sentences.
-
D.
International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda
The International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda was a UN-established court mandated to prosecute individuals responsible for genocide and other serious violations of international humanitarian law committed in Rwanda in 1994.
-
E.
International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia
The International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia was a UN court established to prosecute individuals responsible for war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide committed during the conflicts in the Balkans in the 1990s.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Target entity: ICTR Appeals Chamber Target entity description: The ICTR Appeals Chamber was the highest judicial body of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, responsible for hearing appeals against trial judgments in cases concerning the 1994 Rwandan genocide.
-
A.
ICTR Trial Chamber I
ICTR Trial Chamber I was a judicial division of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda responsible for hearing and adjudicating cases related to the 1994 Rwandan genocide.
-
B.
Trial Chamber I of the ICTR
Trial Chamber I of the ICTR was one of the first-instance judicial divisions of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, responsible for hearing and deciding genocide and crimes against humanity cases, including the landmark Akayesu trial.
-
C.
Appeals Chamber of the ICTY
The Appeals Chamber of the ICTY was the judicial body of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia responsible for hearing and deciding appeals from its trial judgments and sentences.
-
D.
International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda
The International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda was a UN-established court mandated to prosecute individuals responsible for genocide and other serious violations of international humanitarian law committed in Rwanda in 1994.
-
E.
International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia
The International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia was a UN court established to prosecute individuals responsible for war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide committed during the conflicts in the Balkans in the 1990s.
- F. None of above. chosen
Statements (46)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf |
international criminal appeals chamber
ⓘ
judicial organ ⓘ |
| appliesToJurisdiction | International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda ⓘ |
| can |
affirm trial judgments
ⓘ
order retrials in exceptional circumstances ⓘ reverse trial judgments ⓘ revise sentences ⓘ |
| canIssue |
appeals judgments
ⓘ
separate and dissenting opinions by judges ⓘ |
| ceasedToFunctionWith | closure of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda ⓘ |
| decidesBy | majority vote ⓘ |
| establishedBy | United Nations Security Council ⓘ |
| establishedByInstrument |
United Nations Security Council Resolution 955
ⓘ
linked to:
UN Security Council Resolution 955
|
| establishedInYear | 1994 ⓘ |
| function |
hear appeals against trial judgments
ⓘ
review convictions and acquittals ⓘ review sentences ⓘ |
| hasNumberOfJudges | 7 ⓘ |
| hearsAppealsFrom |
Prosecutor of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda
ⓘ
convicted persons ⓘ |
| languageOfProceedings |
English
ⓘ
French ⓘ |
| legalBasis | Statute of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda ⓘ |
| legalSubjectMatter |
crimes against humanity
ⓘ
crimes committed during the 1994 Rwandan genocide ⓘ genocide ⓘ war crimes ⓘ |
| locatedIn |
Arusha
ⓘ
linked to:
Arusha, Tanzania
Tanzania ⓘ |
| mandate |
ensure consistency and correctness of ICTR case law
ⓘ
guarantee fair trial rights at appellate level ⓘ |
| parentOrganization | United Nations ⓘ |
| partOf | International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda ⓘ |
| reviews | final judgments of ICTR Trial Chambers ⓘ |
| reviewsDecisionsOf |
ICTR Trial Chambers
ⓘ
linked to:
Chambers of the ICTR
|
| role | highest judicial body of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda ⓘ |
| sharesAppealsChamberWith | International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia ⓘ |
| standardOfReview |
discernible errors of fact
ⓘ
errors of law ⓘ |
| subjectTo |
United Nations Charter
ⓘ
linked to:
Charter of the United Nations
|
| successorBody | International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals Appeals Chamber ⓘ |
| temporalJurisdiction | crimes committed in 1994 ⓘ |
| territorialJurisdiction |
territory of Rwanda
ⓘ
territory of neighbouring States for certain crimes ⓘ |
| typeOfCourt | ad hoc international criminal tribunal appeals chamber ⓘ |
| usesProceduralLaw |
ICTR Rules of Procedure and Evidence
ⓘ
linked to:
Rules of Procedure and Evidence of the ICTR
|
How these facts were elicited
The pipeline generated the facts above by prompting gpt-5.1 with this entity's name + description and the instruction below.
You are a knowledge base construction expert. Given a subject entity and a description of it, return factual statements that you know for the subject as a JSON list of dictionaries(triples), where keys must be "subject", "predicate" and "object". The number of facts may be very high, between 25 to 50 or more, for very popular subjects. For less popular subjects, the number of facts can be very low, like 5 or 10. # Requirements - If you don't know the subject at all, return an empty list. - If the subject is not a named entity, return an empty list. - Include at least one triple where predicate is "instanceOf". - Do not get too wordy. - Separate several objects into multiple triples with one object.
Subject: ICTR Appeals Chamber Description of subject: The ICTR Appeals Chamber was the highest judicial body of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, responsible for hearing appeals against trial judgments in cases concerning the 1994 Rwandan genocide.
Referenced by (7)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.