Debating Christian Theism
E725373
Debating Christian Theism is a scholarly volume of essays and debates that critically examines the truth-claims of Christian theism from both theistic and atheistic perspectives.
All labels observed (1)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| Debating Christian Theism canonical | 1 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T8332779 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
Target entity: Debating Christian Theism Context triple: [William Lane Craig, hasWritten, Debating Christian Theism]
-
A.
The Coherence of Theism
The Coherence of Theism is a major work of analytic philosophy of religion in which Richard Swinburne rigorously examines whether the central claims of traditional theism are logically consistent and intelligible.
-
B.
The Analytic Theist
The Analytic Theist is a collection of essays and interviews by philosopher Alvin Plantinga that explores and defends the rationality of theistic belief using tools of contemporary analytic philosophy.
-
C.
The Trial of Theism
The Trial of Theism is a 19th-century freethought work by secularist writer George Holyoake that critically examines and challenges the rational basis of religious theism.
-
D.
The Reasonableness of Christianity
The Reasonableness of Christianity is a 1695 theological treatise by John Locke arguing that the core of Christian faith is a simple, rational belief in Jesus as the Messiah rather than adherence to complex doctrinal systems.
-
E.
Man’s Vision of God and the Logic of Theism
"Man’s Vision of God and the Logic of Theism" is a philosophical work that develops Charles Hartshorne’s process-oriented, neoclassical conception of God and offers a rigorous logical defense of theism.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Target entity: Debating Christian Theism Target entity description: Debating Christian Theism is a scholarly volume of essays and debates that critically examines the truth-claims of Christian theism from both theistic and atheistic perspectives.
-
A.
The Coherence of Theism
The Coherence of Theism is a major work of analytic philosophy of religion in which Richard Swinburne rigorously examines whether the central claims of traditional theism are logically consistent and intelligible.
-
B.
The Analytic Theist
The Analytic Theist is a collection of essays and interviews by philosopher Alvin Plantinga that explores and defends the rationality of theistic belief using tools of contemporary analytic philosophy.
-
C.
The Trial of Theism
The Trial of Theism is a 19th-century freethought work by secularist writer George Holyoake that critically examines and challenges the rational basis of religious theism.
-
D.
The Reasonableness of Christianity
The Reasonableness of Christianity is a 1695 theological treatise by John Locke arguing that the core of Christian faith is a simple, rational belief in Jesus as the Messiah rather than adherence to complex doctrinal systems.
-
E.
Man’s Vision of God and the Logic of Theism
"Man’s Vision of God and the Logic of Theism" is a philosophical work that develops Charles Hartshorne’s process-oriented, neoclassical conception of God and offers a rigorous logical defense of theism.
- F. None of above. chosen
Statements (46)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf |
book
ⓘ
edited volume ⓘ |
| academicDiscipline | analytic philosophy ⓘ |
| academicLevel | scholarly ⓘ |
| approach |
critical examination of Christian theism
ⓘ
dialogue between theists and atheists ⓘ |
| contains |
philosophical debates
ⓘ
scholarly essays ⓘ |
| countryOfPublication |
United States of America
ⓘ
surface form:
United States
|
| editor |
Chad V. Meister
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
J. P. Moreland NERFINISHED ⓘ Khaldoun A. Sweis NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| focusesOn |
cosmological arguments
ⓘ
divine hiddenness ⓘ evidential arguments against God ⓘ evidential arguments for God ⓘ moral arguments for God ⓘ problem of evil ⓘ reliability of the New Testament ⓘ resurrection of Jesus ⓘ teleological arguments ⓘ |
| genre |
apologetics
ⓘ
atheism ⓘ philosophy of religion ⓘ |
| hasFormat |
digital
ⓘ
hardcover ⓘ paperback ⓘ |
| hasPerspective |
atheistic
ⓘ
theistic ⓘ |
| intendedAudience |
apologists
ⓘ
philosophers of religion ⓘ skeptics ⓘ students ⓘ theologians ⓘ |
| language | English ⓘ |
| mainSubject |
Christian theism
ⓘ
arguments against the existence of God ⓘ arguments for the existence of God ⓘ truth-claims of Christianity ⓘ |
| mediaType |
ebook
ⓘ
print ⓘ |
| publicationDate | 2013 ⓘ |
| publisher | Oxford University Press ⓘ |
| subjectArea |
philosophy
ⓘ
religious studies ⓘ theology ⓘ |
How these facts were elicited
The pipeline generated the facts above by prompting gpt-5.1 with this entity's name + description and the instruction below.
You are a knowledge base construction expert. Given a subject entity and a description of it, return factual statements that you know for the subject as a JSON list of dictionaries(triples), where keys must be "subject", "predicate" and "object". The number of facts may be very high, between 25 to 50 or more, for very popular subjects. For less popular subjects, the number of facts can be very low, like 5 or 10. # Requirements - If you don't know the subject at all, return an empty list. - If the subject is not a named entity, return an empty list. - Include at least one triple where predicate is "instanceOf". - Do not get too wordy. - Separate several objects into multiple triples with one object.
Subject: Debating Christian Theism Description of subject: Debating Christian Theism is a scholarly volume of essays and debates that critically examines the truth-claims of Christian theism from both theistic and atheistic perspectives.
Referenced by (1)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.