Mattel, Inc. v. MCA Records, Inc.

E709613

Mattel, Inc. v. MCA Records, Inc. is a landmark U.S. copyright and trademark case in which the Ninth Circuit, in an opinion by Judge Alex Kozinski, held that the song "Barbie Girl" was protected parody and did not infringe Mattel’s rights in the Barbie doll.

All labels observed (1)

Label Occurrences
Mattel, Inc. v. MCA Records, Inc. canonical 1

How this entity was disambiguated

Statements (46)

Predicate Object
instanceOf Ninth Circuit case
United States court case
copyright case
trademark case
appliesTest Rogers test
areaOfLaw entertainment law
intellectual property law
citation 296 F.3d 894
63 U.S.P.Q.2d 1715
country United States
court United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
decisionDate 2002
defendant Aqua
MCA Music Scandinavia AB
MCA Records, Inc.
linked to: MCA Records

Universal Music Group, Inc.
docketNumber No. 99-56003
famousQuote "The parties are advised to chill."
holding Mattel’s trademark claims were barred by the First Amendment
the song "Barbie Girl" does not dilute the Barbie trademark
the song "Barbie Girl" does not infringe Mattel’s Barbie trademark
the song "Barbie Girl" is a protected parody under the First Amendment
linked to: Barbie Girl
industryContext music industry
toy industry
involvesCopyright Barbie-related intellectual property
involvesTrademark Barbie
linked to: Barbie doll
involvesWork Barbie Girl
Barbie doll
jurisdiction Ninth Circuit
United States
languageOfOpinion English
legalPrinciple parody can be a defense to trademark infringement and dilution claims
trademark law does not confer a right to control language
use of a trademark in the title and lyrics of an expressive work can be protected by the First Amendment
notableFor articulating strong First Amendment protection against trademark claims
defining the scope of parody protection for pop music
opinionBy Alex Kozinski
plaintiff Mattel, Inc.
linked to: Mattel
relatedCase Rogers v. Grimaldi
result Mattel’s claims were dismissed
judgment in favor of MCA Records and other defendants
subjectMatter First Amendment
copyright law
fair use
parody
trademark law

How these facts were elicited

Referenced by (1)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

Alex Kozinski notableCaseInvolvement Mattel, Inc. v. MCA Records, Inc.