United States v. Louisiana (1960)
E698631
United States v. Louisiana (1960) is a U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified federal versus state ownership and control over offshore submerged lands and natural resources in the Gulf of Mexico.
All labels observed (1)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| United States v. Louisiana (1960) canonical | 1 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T7847931 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: United States v. Louisiana (1960) Context triple: [Outer Continental Shelf, relatedCaseLaw, United States v. Louisiana (1960)]
-
A.
Roberts v. Louisiana
Roberts v. Louisiana is a 1976 U.S. Supreme Court decision that, alongside Gregg v. Georgia, helped define the constitutional limits on capital punishment under the Eighth Amendment.
-
B.
Cox v. Louisiana
Cox v. Louisiana is a landmark 1965 U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified the limits of state power to restrict public demonstrations and protected civil rights protest activities under the First Amendment.
-
C.
Duncan v. Louisiana
Duncan v. Louisiana is a 1968 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held the Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial in criminal cases applies to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment.
-
D.
Hans v. Louisiana
Hans v. Louisiana is an 1890 U.S. Supreme Court decision that established that a citizen cannot sue their own state in federal court without the state's consent, significantly shaping Eleventh Amendment sovereign immunity doctrine.
-
E.
Stone v. Mississippi
Stone v. Mississippi is an 1880 U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a state cannot irrevocably surrender its police power, allowing Mississippi to prohibit a previously chartered lottery despite contractual claims.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: United States v. Louisiana (1960) Target entity description: United States v. Louisiana (1960) is a U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified federal versus state ownership and control over offshore submerged lands and natural resources in the Gulf of Mexico.
-
A.
Roberts v. Louisiana
Roberts v. Louisiana is a 1976 U.S. Supreme Court decision that, alongside Gregg v. Georgia, helped define the constitutional limits on capital punishment under the Eighth Amendment.
-
B.
Cox v. Louisiana
Cox v. Louisiana is a landmark 1965 U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified the limits of state power to restrict public demonstrations and protected civil rights protest activities under the First Amendment.
-
C.
Duncan v. Louisiana
Duncan v. Louisiana is a 1968 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held the Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial in criminal cases applies to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment.
-
D.
Hans v. Louisiana
Hans v. Louisiana is an 1890 U.S. Supreme Court decision that established that a citizen cannot sue their own state in federal court without the state's consent, significantly shaping Eleventh Amendment sovereign immunity doctrine.
-
E.
Stone v. Mississippi
Stone v. Mississippi is an 1880 U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a state cannot irrevocably surrender its police power, allowing Mississippi to prohibit a previously chartered lottery despite contractual claims.
- F. None of above. chosen
Statements (39)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf |
United States Supreme Court case
ⓘ
federal-state boundary dispute ⓘ original jurisdiction case ⓘ |
| area | Gulf of Mexico NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| citation | 363 U.S. 1 ⓘ |
| clarified |
extent of state seaward boundaries in the Gulf of Mexico
ⓘ
scope of federal control over offshore submerged lands beyond state boundaries ⓘ |
| country |
United States of America
ⓘ
surface form:
United States
|
| court | Supreme Court of the United States ⓘ |
| decisionDate | 1960 ⓘ |
| geographicFocus | coastlines of Louisiana, Texas, Mississippi, Alabama, and Florida ⓘ |
| holding |
coastal states’ seaward boundaries in the Gulf of Mexico are limited as defined by federal law and prior Supreme Court decisions
ⓘ
the United States has paramount rights in and full dominion and power over the outer continental shelf beyond state boundaries ⓘ |
| impact |
clarified federal ownership of natural resources on the outer continental shelf in the Gulf of Mexico
ⓘ
limited state claims to offshore mineral revenues beyond their recognized boundaries ⓘ |
| jurisdiction | original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court of the United States ⓘ |
| language | English ⓘ |
| legalDomain |
United States constitutional law
ⓘ
federalism ⓘ natural resources law ⓘ |
| legalIssue |
control of natural resources on the outer continental shelf
ⓘ
interpretation of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act ⓘ interpretation of the Submerged Lands Act ⓘ ownership of offshore submerged lands in the Gulf of Mexico ⓘ seaward boundary of coastal states in the Gulf of Mexico ⓘ |
| petitioner | United States NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| precedentFor | later disputes over offshore oil and gas revenue sharing ⓘ |
| relatedLegislation |
Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act of 1953
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
Submerged Lands Act of 1953 NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| respondent |
Alabama
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
Florida NERFINISHED ⓘ Louisiana NERFINISHED ⓘ Mississippi NERFINISHED ⓘ Texas NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| result | judgment largely in favor of the United States ⓘ |
| subjectMatter |
offshore oil and gas resources
ⓘ
state versus federal sovereignty ⓘ submerged lands ⓘ |
| typeOfDispute | boundary dispute between federal government and coastal states ⓘ |
How these facts were elicited
The pipeline generated the facts above by prompting gpt-5.1 with this entity's name + description and the instruction below.
Instruction
You are a knowledge base construction expert. Given a subject entity and a description of it, return factual statements that you know for the subject as a JSON list of dictionaries(triples), where keys must be "subject", "predicate" and "object". The number of facts may be very high, between 25 to 50 or more, for very popular subjects. For less popular subjects, the number of facts can be very low, like 5 or 10. # Requirements - If you don't know the subject at all, return an empty list. - If the subject is not a named entity, return an empty list. - Include at least one triple where predicate is "instanceOf". - Do not get too wordy. - Separate several objects into multiple triples with one object.
Input
Subject: United States v. Louisiana (1960) Description of subject: United States v. Louisiana (1960) is a U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified federal versus state ownership and control over offshore submerged lands and natural resources in the Gulf of Mexico.
Referenced by (1)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.