Acheson–Lilienthal Report
E657736
The Acheson–Lilienthal Report was a 1946 U.S. government study that proposed an international authority to control atomic energy and prevent nuclear weapons proliferation in the early Cold War era.
All labels observed (1)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| Acheson–Lilienthal Report canonical | 1 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T7333948 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Acheson–Lilienthal Report Context triple: [Baruch Plan for international control of atomic energy, basedOn, Acheson–Lilienthal Report]
-
A.
Quebec Agreement
The Quebec Agreement was a 1943 wartime accord between the United States and the United Kingdom that formalized their collaboration on nuclear weapons development and set terms for postwar control and use of atomic energy.
-
B.
Baruch Plan for international control of atomic energy
The Baruch Plan for international control of atomic energy was a 1946 U.S. proposal to place all nuclear activities under international oversight to prevent nuclear weapons proliferation and promote peaceful uses of atomic energy.
-
C.
NSC-68
NSC-68 was a pivotal 1950 U.S. national security policy paper that called for a massive military buildup and global containment strategy against Soviet expansion during the early Cold War.
-
D.
Kennan’s Long Telegram
Kennan’s Long Telegram is a 1946 diplomatic cable by U.S. diplomat George F. Kennan that laid the intellectual foundation for the Cold War policy of containment toward the Soviet Union.
-
E.
Wedemeyer Report
The Wedemeyer Report is a post–World War II strategic assessment authored by U.S. Army General Albert C. Wedemeyer that evaluated American military and political policy in Asia, particularly regarding China and Korea.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Acheson–Lilienthal Report Target entity description: The Acheson–Lilienthal Report was a 1946 U.S. government study that proposed an international authority to control atomic energy and prevent nuclear weapons proliferation in the early Cold War era.
-
A.
Quebec Agreement
The Quebec Agreement was a 1943 wartime accord between the United States and the United Kingdom that formalized their collaboration on nuclear weapons development and set terms for postwar control and use of atomic energy.
-
B.
Baruch Plan for international control of atomic energy
The Baruch Plan for international control of atomic energy was a 1946 U.S. proposal to place all nuclear activities under international oversight to prevent nuclear weapons proliferation and promote peaceful uses of atomic energy.
-
C.
NSC-68
NSC-68 was a pivotal 1950 U.S. national security policy paper that called for a massive military buildup and global containment strategy against Soviet expansion during the early Cold War.
-
D.
Kennan’s Long Telegram
Kennan’s Long Telegram is a 1946 diplomatic cable by U.S. diplomat George F. Kennan that laid the intellectual foundation for the Cold War policy of containment toward the Soviet Union.
-
E.
Wedemeyer Report
The Wedemeyer Report is a post–World War II strategic assessment authored by U.S. Army General Albert C. Wedemeyer that evaluated American military and political policy in Asia, particularly regarding China and Korea.
- F. None of above. chosen
Statements (44)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf |
government report
ⓘ
policy proposal ⓘ |
| aimedTo |
establish international ownership of dangerous nuclear activities
ⓘ
prevent nuclear weapons proliferation ⓘ |
| archivedAt | U.S. National Archives NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| associatedWith | U.S. atomic energy policy formation ⓘ |
| commissionedBy | Harry S. Truman NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| concernedWith |
peaceful uses of atomic energy
ⓘ
prevention of atomic arms race ⓘ |
| context |
United States nuclear monopoly
ⓘ
post–World War II atomic diplomacy ⓘ |
| countryOfOrigin |
United States of America
ⓘ
surface form:
United States
|
| dateCompleted | March 1946 ⓘ |
| draftedBy |
David E. Lilienthal
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
Dean Acheson NERFINISHED ⓘ J. Robert Oppenheimer NERFINISHED ⓘ a panel of nuclear scientists ⓘ |
| field |
arms control
ⓘ
international security ⓘ nuclear policy ⓘ |
| genre | policy study ⓘ |
| historicalPeriod | early Cold War ⓘ |
| influenced | Baruch Plan NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| influencedDebateOn |
global nuclear governance
ⓘ
international atomic energy regulation ⓘ |
| inspiredBy | concerns over future nuclear war ⓘ |
| intendedAudience | U.S. government policymakers ⓘ |
| language | English ⓘ |
| mainSubject |
international control of atomic energy
ⓘ
nuclear weapons proliferation ⓘ |
| namedAfter |
David E. Lilienthal
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
Dean Acheson NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| proposedBy | United States Department of State NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| proposedCreationOf | international atomic development authority NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| proposedMechanism |
licensing of non-dangerous nuclear activities to nations
ⓘ
transfer of certain nuclear activities to international ownership ⓘ |
| proposedPolicy |
inspection and control of nuclear activities by an international authority
ⓘ
international ownership of all dangerous phases of the nuclear fuel cycle ⓘ |
| publicationYear | 1946 ⓘ |
| recommendedAgainst | reliance solely on national safeguards for atomic energy ⓘ |
| relatedTo | United Nations Atomic Energy Commission NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| status | unimplemented as originally proposed ⓘ |
| timePeriod | postwar era ⓘ |
| typeOfControlEnvisioned | supranational control of atomic energy ⓘ |
How these facts were elicited
The pipeline generated the facts above by prompting gpt-5.1 with this entity's name + description and the instruction below.
Instruction
You are a knowledge base construction expert. Given a subject entity and a description of it, return factual statements that you know for the subject as a JSON list of dictionaries(triples), where keys must be "subject", "predicate" and "object". The number of facts may be very high, between 25 to 50 or more, for very popular subjects. For less popular subjects, the number of facts can be very low, like 5 or 10. # Requirements - If you don't know the subject at all, return an empty list. - If the subject is not a named entity, return an empty list. - Include at least one triple where predicate is "instanceOf". - Do not get too wordy. - Separate several objects into multiple triples with one object.
Input
Subject: Acheson–Lilienthal Report Description of subject: The Acheson–Lilienthal Report was a 1946 U.S. government study that proposed an international authority to control atomic energy and prevent nuclear weapons proliferation in the early Cold War era.
Referenced by (1)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.