National Labor Relations Board v. Friedman-Harry Marks Clothing Co.
E615007
National Labor Relations Board v. Friedman-Harry Marks Clothing Co. is a United States Supreme Court decision from the Hughes Court era involving the scope of federal labor law and the authority of the National Labor Relations Board over employer-employee relations.
All labels observed (1)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| National Labor Relations Board v. Friedman-Harry Marks Clothing Co. canonical | 1 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T6737215 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
Target entity: National Labor Relations Board v. Friedman-Harry Marks Clothing Co. Context triple: [United States Supreme Court cases of the Hughes Court, includesCase, National Labor Relations Board v. Friedman-Harry Marks Clothing Co.]
-
A.
Hudgens v. NLRB
Hudgens v. NLRB is a 1976 U.S. Supreme Court decision in which the Burger Court held that the First Amendment does not guarantee union organizers the right to picket on privately owned shopping center property.
-
B.
NLRB v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.
NLRB v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. is a landmark 1937 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld federal power to regulate labor relations, marking a major expansion of Congress’s authority over interstate commerce.
-
C.
Commissioner v. Glenshaw Glass Co.
Commissioner v. Glenshaw Glass Co. is a landmark 1955 U.S. Supreme Court case that broadly defined "gross income" under the Internal Revenue Code to include punitive damages and other undeniable accessions to wealth.
-
D.
BE&K Construction Co. v. NLRB
BE&K Construction Co. v. NLRB is a 2002 U.S. Supreme Court case that addressed when an employer’s unsuccessful but reasonably based lawsuit against a union can be treated as an unfair labor practice under federal labor law.
-
E.
Hague v. CIO
Hague v. CIO is a 1939 U.S. Supreme Court case that significantly shaped First Amendment jurisprudence by affirming protections for public assembly and speech in public forums.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Target entity: National Labor Relations Board v. Friedman-Harry Marks Clothing Co. Target entity description: National Labor Relations Board v. Friedman-Harry Marks Clothing Co. is a United States Supreme Court decision from the Hughes Court era involving the scope of federal labor law and the authority of the National Labor Relations Board over employer-employee relations.
-
A.
Hudgens v. NLRB
Hudgens v. NLRB is a 1976 U.S. Supreme Court decision in which the Burger Court held that the First Amendment does not guarantee union organizers the right to picket on privately owned shopping center property.
-
B.
NLRB v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.
NLRB v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. is a landmark 1937 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld federal power to regulate labor relations, marking a major expansion of Congress’s authority over interstate commerce.
-
C.
Commissioner v. Glenshaw Glass Co.
Commissioner v. Glenshaw Glass Co. is a landmark 1955 U.S. Supreme Court case that broadly defined "gross income" under the Internal Revenue Code to include punitive damages and other undeniable accessions to wealth.
-
D.
BE&K Construction Co. v. NLRB
BE&K Construction Co. v. NLRB is a 2002 U.S. Supreme Court case that addressed when an employer’s unsuccessful but reasonably based lawsuit against a union can be treated as an unfair labor practice under federal labor law.
-
E.
Hague v. CIO
Hague v. CIO is a 1939 U.S. Supreme Court case that significantly shaped First Amendment jurisprudence by affirming protections for public assembly and speech in public forums.
- F. None of above. chosen
Statements (30)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf |
New Deal–era case
ⓘ
United States Supreme Court case ⓘ labor law case ⓘ |
| addresses |
employer resistance to NLRB orders
ⓘ
enforcement of NLRB authority ⓘ |
| branchOfLaw |
administrative law
ⓘ
public law ⓘ |
| concerns |
authority of the National Labor Relations Board
ⓘ
employer-employee relations ⓘ scope of federal labor law ⓘ |
| country |
United States of America
ⓘ
surface form:
United States
|
| court | Supreme Court of the United States ⓘ |
| era | Hughes Court NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| historicalContext | New Deal labor reforms ⓘ |
| involves |
National Labor Relations Act
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
regulation of interstate commerce through labor relations ⓘ |
| jurisdiction | federal ⓘ |
| legalSubject |
collective bargaining
ⓘ
labor law ⓘ unfair labor practices ⓘ |
| partyTypeOfPetitioner | independent federal agency ⓘ |
| petitioner | National Labor Relations Board NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| petitionerRole | labor relations regulator ⓘ |
| relatedTo |
Friedman-Harry Marks Clothing Co.
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
Hughes Court NERFINISHED ⓘ National Labor Relations Board NERFINISHED ⓘ federal regulation of labor relations ⓘ |
| respondent | Friedman-Harry Marks Clothing Co. NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| respondentIndustry | clothing manufacturing ⓘ |
| typeOfDispute | labor-management dispute ⓘ |
How these facts were elicited
The pipeline generated the facts above by prompting gpt-5.1 with this entity's name + description and the instruction below.
You are a knowledge base construction expert. Given a subject entity and a description of it, return factual statements that you know for the subject as a JSON list of dictionaries(triples), where keys must be "subject", "predicate" and "object". The number of facts may be very high, between 25 to 50 or more, for very popular subjects. For less popular subjects, the number of facts can be very low, like 5 or 10. # Requirements - If you don't know the subject at all, return an empty list. - If the subject is not a named entity, return an empty list. - Include at least one triple where predicate is "instanceOf". - Do not get too wordy. - Separate several objects into multiple triples with one object.
Subject: National Labor Relations Board v. Friedman-Harry Marks Clothing Co. Description of subject: National Labor Relations Board v. Friedman-Harry Marks Clothing Co. is a United States Supreme Court decision from the Hughes Court era involving the scope of federal labor law and the authority of the National Labor Relations Board over employer-employee relations.
Referenced by (1)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.