De incertitudine et vanitate scientiarum et artium
E520305
De incertitudine et vanitate scientiarum et artium is a 16th-century work by Heinrich Cornelius Agrippa that offers a skeptical critique of the value and reliability of contemporary sciences and arts.
All labels observed (1)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| De incertitudine et vanitate scientiarum et artium canonical | 1 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T5444316 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
Target entity: De incertitudine et vanitate scientiarum et artium Context triple: [Heinrich Cornelius Agrippa, notableWork, De incertitudine et vanitate scientiarum et artium]
-
A.
De Homine
De Homine is a philosophical treatise by Thomas Hobbes that examines human nature, sensation, and behavior within his broader mechanistic and materialist framework.
-
B.
The Incoherence of the Philosophers
The Incoherence of the Philosophers is a landmark 11th-century work of Islamic philosophy and theology by Al-Ghazali that critiques the metaphysical doctrines of earlier Muslim philosophers and helped reshape the course of Islamic thought.
-
C.
Treatise on Nature and Grace
Treatise on Nature and Grace is a philosophical and theological work by Nicolas Malebranche that explores the relationship between divine providence, grace, and the natural order.
-
D.
Introductio ad philosophiam aulicam
Introductio ad philosophiam aulicam is an early modern philosophical work by Christian Thomasius that outlines principles of courtly conduct and practical philosophy for life at court.
-
E.
Nicholas of Cusa's De docta ignorantia
Nicholas of Cusa's *De docta ignorantia* is a foundational 15th-century philosophical and theological treatise that articulates the idea that true wisdom arises from recognizing the limits of human knowledge, deeply influencing Renaissance Platonism.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Target entity: De incertitudine et vanitate scientiarum et artium Target entity description: De incertitudine et vanitate scientiarum et artium is a 16th-century work by Heinrich Cornelius Agrippa that offers a skeptical critique of the value and reliability of contemporary sciences and arts.
-
A.
De Homine
De Homine is a philosophical treatise by Thomas Hobbes that examines human nature, sensation, and behavior within his broader mechanistic and materialist framework.
-
B.
The Incoherence of the Philosophers
The Incoherence of the Philosophers is a landmark 11th-century work of Islamic philosophy and theology by Al-Ghazali that critiques the metaphysical doctrines of earlier Muslim philosophers and helped reshape the course of Islamic thought.
-
C.
Treatise on Nature and Grace
Treatise on Nature and Grace is a philosophical and theological work by Nicolas Malebranche that explores the relationship between divine providence, grace, and the natural order.
-
D.
Introductio ad philosophiam aulicam
Introductio ad philosophiam aulicam is an early modern philosophical work by Christian Thomasius that outlines principles of courtly conduct and practical philosophy for life at court.
-
E.
Nicholas of Cusa's De docta ignorantia
Nicholas of Cusa's *De docta ignorantia* is a foundational 15th-century philosophical and theological treatise that articulates the idea that true wisdom arises from recognizing the limits of human knowledge, deeply influencing Renaissance Platonism.
- F. None of above. chosen
Statements (43)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf |
Renaissance treatise
ⓘ
book ⓘ |
| addresses |
the instability of worldly fame
ⓘ
the moral dangers of curiosity ⓘ the reliability of human knowledge ⓘ |
| aimsTo |
expose the limitations of human learning
ⓘ
warn against the vanity of secular knowledge ⓘ |
| associatedWith |
Christian humanism
ⓘ
occult philosopher Heinrich Cornelius Agrippa ⓘ |
| author | Heinrich Cornelius Agrippa NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| contrastsWith | humanist optimism about learning ⓘ |
| countryOfOrigin | Holy Roman Empire ⓘ |
| criticizes |
astrology
ⓘ
contemporary arts ⓘ contemporary sciences ⓘ law ⓘ magic ⓘ medicine ⓘ philosophy ⓘ rhetoric ⓘ scholastic learning ⓘ theology ⓘ |
| genre |
polemical work
ⓘ
skeptical literature ⓘ |
| hasAlternativeName |
De incertitudine et vanitate scientiarum
ⓘ
On the Uncertainty and Vanity of the Sciences and Arts NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| hasPerspective |
emphasis on the limits of human reason
ⓘ
moral critique of intellectual pride ⓘ |
| historicalContext | Reformation era NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| influencedBy |
Christian theology
ⓘ
classical skepticism ⓘ |
| intendedAudience | learned readers ⓘ |
| literaryForm | prose ⓘ |
| mainTheme |
critique of the arts
ⓘ
critique of the sciences ⓘ skepticism about human knowledge ⓘ vanity of worldly learning ⓘ |
| originalLanguage | Latin ⓘ |
| period | Renaissance NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| philosophicalCurrent | Renaissance skepticism NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| philosophicalDiscipline |
epistemology
ⓘ
ethics ⓘ |
| publicationCentury | 16th century ⓘ |
How these facts were elicited
The pipeline generated the facts above by prompting gpt-5.1 with this entity's name + description and the instruction below.
You are a knowledge base construction expert. Given a subject entity and a description of it, return factual statements that you know for the subject as a JSON list of dictionaries(triples), where keys must be "subject", "predicate" and "object". The number of facts may be very high, between 25 to 50 or more, for very popular subjects. For less popular subjects, the number of facts can be very low, like 5 or 10. # Requirements - If you don't know the subject at all, return an empty list. - If the subject is not a named entity, return an empty list. - Include at least one triple where predicate is "instanceOf". - Do not get too wordy. - Separate several objects into multiple triples with one object.
Subject: De incertitudine et vanitate scientiarum et artium Description of subject: De incertitudine et vanitate scientiarum et artium is a 16th-century work by Heinrich Cornelius Agrippa that offers a skeptical critique of the value and reliability of contemporary sciences and arts.
Referenced by (1)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.