Federal Housing Administration v. Burr
E494924
Federal Housing Administration v. Burr is a landmark 1940 U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified the scope of federal sovereign immunity by holding that the FHA could be sued in certain circumstances under its "sue and be sued" clause.
All labels observed (1)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| Federal Housing Administration v. Burr canonical | 1 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T5099970 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Federal Housing Administration v. Burr Context triple: [United States sovereign immunity law, keyCase, Federal Housing Administration v. Burr]
-
A.
Home Building & Loan Association v. Blaisdell
Home Building & Loan Association v. Blaisdell is a 1934 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld a state mortgage moratorium law during the Great Depression, marking a major limitation on the absolute scope of the Contract Clause.
-
B.
Shelley v. Kraemer
Shelley v. Kraemer is a landmark 1948 U.S. Supreme Court case that held courts could not enforce racially restrictive housing covenants, marking a major civil rights victory against residential segregation.
-
C.
Briggs v. Elliott
Briggs v. Elliott was a landmark federal court case from South Carolina challenging racial segregation in public schools, and it became one of the key cases consolidated into Brown v. Board of Education.
-
D.
Hurd v. Hodge
Hurd v. Hodge is a 1948 U.S. Supreme Court case that held racially restrictive covenants in property deeds could not be judicially enforced in the District of Columbia because such enforcement would violate the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause.
-
E.
Bolling v. Sharpe
Bolling v. Sharpe is a 1954 U.S. Supreme Court case that held racial segregation in Washington, D.C. public schools unconstitutional under the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Federal Housing Administration v. Burr Target entity description: Federal Housing Administration v. Burr is a landmark 1940 U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified the scope of federal sovereign immunity by holding that the FHA could be sued in certain circumstances under its "sue and be sued" clause.
-
A.
Home Building & Loan Association v. Blaisdell
Home Building & Loan Association v. Blaisdell is a 1934 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld a state mortgage moratorium law during the Great Depression, marking a major limitation on the absolute scope of the Contract Clause.
-
B.
Shelley v. Kraemer
Shelley v. Kraemer is a landmark 1948 U.S. Supreme Court case that held courts could not enforce racially restrictive housing covenants, marking a major civil rights victory against residential segregation.
-
C.
Briggs v. Elliott
Briggs v. Elliott was a landmark federal court case from South Carolina challenging racial segregation in public schools, and it became one of the key cases consolidated into Brown v. Board of Education.
-
D.
Hurd v. Hodge
Hurd v. Hodge is a 1948 U.S. Supreme Court case that held racially restrictive covenants in property deeds could not be judicially enforced in the District of Columbia because such enforcement would violate the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause.
-
E.
Bolling v. Sharpe
Bolling v. Sharpe is a 1954 U.S. Supreme Court case that held racial segregation in Washington, D.C. public schools unconstitutional under the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause.
- F. None of above. chosen
Statements (36)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf |
United States Supreme Court case
ⓘ
landmark case ⓘ |
| affects |
federal agencies with corporate powers
ⓘ
government corporations engaged in commercial activities ⓘ |
| areaOfLaw |
administrative law
ⓘ
federal courts ⓘ sovereign immunity ⓘ |
| bindingAuthorityIn | United States federal courts NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| category |
United States Supreme Court cases in 1940
ⓘ
United States administrative case law ⓘ United States sovereign immunity case law ⓘ |
| citation | 309 U.S. 242 ⓘ |
| clarified | that waivers of sovereign immunity in "sue and be sued" clauses should be liberally construed ⓘ |
| country |
United States of America
ⓘ
surface form:
United States
|
| court | Supreme Court of the United States ⓘ |
| decisionDate | 1940 ⓘ |
| decisionType | majority opinion ⓘ |
| holding |
A federal agency with a "sue and be sued" clause is presumptively liable to suit as a private enterprise would be, unless Congress clearly indicates otherwise.
ⓘ
The Federal Housing Administration may be sued under its "sue and be sued" clause in certain circumstances. NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| jurisdiction | federal question jurisdiction ⓘ |
| language | English ⓘ |
| legalIssue |
federal sovereign immunity
ⓘ
scope of "sue and be sued" clauses ⓘ |
| page | 242 ⓘ |
| petitioner | Federal Housing Administration NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| precedentFor |
interpretation of federal agency "sue and be sued" clauses
ⓘ
limitations on federal sovereign immunity for government corporations ⓘ |
| relatedTo |
Federal Housing Administration
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
sovereign immunity of the United States ⓘ |
| reporter | United States Reports ⓘ |
| respondent | Burr NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| subjectMatter |
construction of statutory waivers of immunity
ⓘ
liability of a federal agency to suit ⓘ |
| timePeriod | 20th century ⓘ |
| volume | 309 ⓘ |
| yearDecided | 1940 ⓘ |
How these facts were elicited
The pipeline generated the facts above by prompting gpt-5.1 with this entity's name + description and the instruction below.
Instruction
You are a knowledge base construction expert. Given a subject entity and a description of it, return factual statements that you know for the subject as a JSON list of dictionaries(triples), where keys must be "subject", "predicate" and "object". The number of facts may be very high, between 25 to 50 or more, for very popular subjects. For less popular subjects, the number of facts can be very low, like 5 or 10. # Requirements - If you don't know the subject at all, return an empty list. - If the subject is not a named entity, return an empty list. - Include at least one triple where predicate is "instanceOf". - Do not get too wordy. - Separate several objects into multiple triples with one object.
Input
Subject: Federal Housing Administration v. Burr Description of subject: Federal Housing Administration v. Burr is a landmark 1940 U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified the scope of federal sovereign immunity by holding that the FHA could be sued in certain circumstances under its "sue and be sued" clause.
Referenced by (1)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.