Parker v. Davis
E452312
Parker v. Davis was a post–Civil War U.S. Supreme Court case that addressed the constitutionality of making paper money legal tender for preexisting debts under the Legal Tender Acts.
All labels observed (1)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| Parker v. Davis canonical | 1 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T4560240 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
Target entity: Parker v. Davis Context triple: [Legal Tender Act of 1862, challengedInCase, Parker v. Davis]
-
A.
Washington v. Davis
Washington v. Davis is a 1976 U.S. Supreme Court case that held laws or policies with a racially disproportionate impact do not violate the Equal Protection Clause absent proof of discriminatory intent.
-
B.
United States v. Darby
United States v. Darby is a 1941 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld federal labor regulations under the Commerce Clause and marked a broad expansion of federal power over economic activity.
-
C.
McDonald v. Smith
McDonald v. Smith is a 1985 U.S. Supreme Court case that held the First Amendment’s Petition Clause does not grant absolute immunity from libel suits for statements made in petitions to government officials.
-
D.
Briggs v. Elliott
Briggs v. Elliott was a landmark federal court case from South Carolina challenging racial segregation in public schools, and it became one of the key cases consolidated into Brown v. Board of Education.
-
E.
Corrigan v. Buckley
Corrigan v. Buckley is a 1926 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld the enforceability of racially restrictive covenants in property deeds, paving the way for widespread legalized housing segregation until later overturned in effect by subsequent civil rights rulings.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Target entity: Parker v. Davis Target entity description: Parker v. Davis was a post–Civil War U.S. Supreme Court case that addressed the constitutionality of making paper money legal tender for preexisting debts under the Legal Tender Acts.
-
A.
Washington v. Davis
Washington v. Davis is a 1976 U.S. Supreme Court case that held laws or policies with a racially disproportionate impact do not violate the Equal Protection Clause absent proof of discriminatory intent.
-
B.
United States v. Darby
United States v. Darby is a 1941 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld federal labor regulations under the Commerce Clause and marked a broad expansion of federal power over economic activity.
-
C.
McDonald v. Smith
McDonald v. Smith is a 1985 U.S. Supreme Court case that held the First Amendment’s Petition Clause does not grant absolute immunity from libel suits for statements made in petitions to government officials.
-
D.
Briggs v. Elliott
Briggs v. Elliott was a landmark federal court case from South Carolina challenging racial segregation in public schools, and it became one of the key cases consolidated into Brown v. Board of Education.
-
E.
Corrigan v. Buckley
Corrigan v. Buckley is a 1926 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld the enforceability of racially restrictive covenants in property deeds, paving the way for widespread legalized housing segregation until later overturned in effect by subsequent civil rights rulings.
- F. None of above. chosen
Statements (30)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf |
United States Supreme Court case
ⓘ
legal case ⓘ |
| addressesQuestion |
constitutionality of making paper money legal tender for preexisting debts
ⓘ
scope of congressional power under the Legal Tender Acts ⓘ |
| appliesLaw |
Legal Tender Acts
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
U.S. Constitution NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| bindingAuthority |
binding precedent on lower federal courts
ⓘ
binding precedent on state courts on questions of federal law ⓘ |
| country | United States of America ⓘ |
| courtType | court of last resort ⓘ |
| decidedBy | Supreme Court of the United States NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| hasJurisdiction | United States federal law ⓘ |
| hasTopic |
Civil War era finance
ⓘ
legal tender ⓘ paper money ⓘ preexisting debts ⓘ |
| historicalContext | Reconstruction era ⓘ |
| language | English ⓘ |
| legalDoctrine |
impairment of contracts
ⓘ
power of Congress over currency ⓘ |
| legalSubject |
constitutional law
ⓘ
contracts ⓘ monetary law ⓘ |
| location | Washington, D.C. ⓘ |
| party |
Davis
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
Parker NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| relatedToCase |
Hepburn v. Griswold
NERFINISHED
ⓘ
Knox v. Lee NERFINISHED ⓘ Legal Tender Cases NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| temporalContext | post–Civil War period ⓘ |
How these facts were elicited
The pipeline generated the facts above by prompting gpt-5.1 with this entity's name + description and the instruction below.
You are a knowledge base construction expert. Given a subject entity and a description of it, return factual statements that you know for the subject as a JSON list of dictionaries(triples), where keys must be "subject", "predicate" and "object". The number of facts may be very high, between 25 to 50 or more, for very popular subjects. For less popular subjects, the number of facts can be very low, like 5 or 10. # Requirements - If you don't know the subject at all, return an empty list. - If the subject is not a named entity, return an empty list. - Include at least one triple where predicate is "instanceOf". - Do not get too wordy. - Separate several objects into multiple triples with one object.
Subject: Parker v. Davis Description of subject: Parker v. Davis was a post–Civil War U.S. Supreme Court case that addressed the constitutionality of making paper money legal tender for preexisting debts under the Legal Tender Acts.
Referenced by (1)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.