United States of America vs. Erhard Milch
E441418
United States of America vs. Erhard Milch was a post–World War II Nuremberg war crimes trial in which former Luftwaffe Field Marshal Erhard Milch was prosecuted for his role in the Nazi regime’s use of forced labor and other atrocities.
All labels observed (1)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| United States of America vs. Erhard Milch canonical | 1 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T4463375 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: United States of America vs. Erhard Milch Context triple: [Nuremberg Milch Trial, officialName, United States of America vs. Erhard Milch]
-
A.
United States of America v. Karl Brandt et al.
United States of America v. Karl Brandt et al. was a post–World War II Nuremberg military tribunal case prosecuting Nazi physicians and officials for war crimes and crimes against humanity arising from inhumane medical experiments and the euthanasia program.
-
B.
United States of America vs. Ernst von Weizsäcker, et al.
United States of America vs. Ernst von Weizsäcker, et al. was a post–World War II American military tribunal held in Nuremberg that prosecuted senior officials of the German Foreign Office and other ministries for their roles in Nazi war crimes and aggressive war.
-
C.
United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp.
United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp. is a landmark 1936 U.S. Supreme Court case that broadly affirmed the president’s independent and plenary authority in conducting foreign affairs.
-
D.
United States v. Eichman
United States v. Eichman is a 1990 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down a federal law banning flag desecration as unconstitutional under the First Amendment’s protection of free speech.
-
E.
United States v. Darby
United States v. Darby is a 1941 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld federal labor regulations under the Commerce Clause and marked a broad expansion of federal power over economic activity.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: United States of America vs. Erhard Milch Target entity description: United States of America vs. Erhard Milch was a post–World War II Nuremberg war crimes trial in which former Luftwaffe Field Marshal Erhard Milch was prosecuted for his role in the Nazi regime’s use of forced labor and other atrocities.
-
A.
United States of America v. Karl Brandt et al.
United States of America v. Karl Brandt et al. was a post–World War II Nuremberg military tribunal case prosecuting Nazi physicians and officials for war crimes and crimes against humanity arising from inhumane medical experiments and the euthanasia program.
-
B.
United States of America vs. Ernst von Weizsäcker, et al.
United States of America vs. Ernst von Weizsäcker, et al. was a post–World War II American military tribunal held in Nuremberg that prosecuted senior officials of the German Foreign Office and other ministries for their roles in Nazi war crimes and aggressive war.
-
C.
United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp.
United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp. is a landmark 1936 U.S. Supreme Court case that broadly affirmed the president’s independent and plenary authority in conducting foreign affairs.
-
D.
United States v. Eichman
United States v. Eichman is a 1990 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down a federal law banning flag desecration as unconstitutional under the First Amendment’s protection of free speech.
-
E.
United States v. Darby
United States v. Darby is a 1941 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld federal labor regulations under the Commerce Clause and marked a broad expansion of federal power over economic activity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Statements (45)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf |
Nuremberg war crimes trial
ⓘ
military tribunal case ⓘ |
| aim |
establishment of individual responsibility for war crimes
ⓘ
prosecution of Nazi leadership for forced labor policies ⓘ |
| alsoKnownAs |
Milch Case
ⓘ
linked to:
Milch
The Milch Trial ⓘ
linked to:
Nuremberg Milch Trial
|
| category |
Crimes against humanity trial
ⓘ
World War II war crimes trial ⓘ |
| charge |
crimes against humanity
ⓘ
mistreatment of concentration camp inmates ⓘ mistreatment of prisoners of war ⓘ participation in slave labor program ⓘ war crimes ⓘ |
| countryOfCourt | United States of America ⓘ |
| court |
United States Military Tribunal II
ⓘ
linked to:
Nuremberg Judges' Trial
|
| dateOfSentence | 1947-04-17 ⓘ |
| defendant | Erhard Milch ⓘ |
| defendantRoleAlleged |
responsible for exploitation of concentration camp inmates
ⓘ
responsible for mistreatment of prisoners of war ⓘ responsible for use of forced labor in aircraft production ⓘ |
| endDate | 1947-04-17 ⓘ |
| historicalPeriod | post–World War II ⓘ |
| judge |
Fitzroy D. Phillips
ⓘ
Michael A. Musmanno ⓘ |
| languageOfProceedings |
English
ⓘ
German ⓘ |
| legalBasis |
Control Council Law No. 10
ⓘ
linked to:
Allied Control Council Law No. 10
|
| legalSystem | military justice ⓘ |
| location |
American Zone of Occupation in Germany
ⓘ
linked to:
American Zone of Occupied Germany
Nuremberg ⓘ |
| organizedBy | Office of Chief of Counsel for War Crimes ⓘ |
| partOf |
Nuremberg Military Tribunals
ⓘ
linked to:
Nuremberg trials
Subsequent Nuremberg Trials ⓘ
linked to:
Nuremberg Subsequent Proceedings
|
| presidingJudge | Robert M. Toms ⓘ |
| prosecutor | United States of America ⓘ |
| relatedTo |
Luftwaffe armaments production
ⓘ
Nazi forced labor program ⓘ Nuremberg Trials ⓘ
linked to:
Nuremberg trials
|
| sentence | life imprisonment ⓘ |
| sentenceLaterCommutedTo | 15 years imprisonment ⓘ |
| startDate | 1946-11-14 ⓘ |
| subjectOf |
international criminal law scholarship
ⓘ
studies of forced labor in Nazi Germany ⓘ |
| verdict |
guilty on count of crimes against humanity
ⓘ
guilty on count of war crimes ⓘ |
How these facts were elicited
The pipeline generated the facts above by prompting gpt-5.1 with this entity's name + description and the instruction below.
Instruction
You are a knowledge base construction expert. Given a subject entity and a description of it, return factual statements that you know for the subject as a JSON list of dictionaries(triples), where keys must be "subject", "predicate" and "object". The number of facts may be very high, between 25 to 50 or more, for very popular subjects. For less popular subjects, the number of facts can be very low, like 5 or 10. # Requirements - If you don't know the subject at all, return an empty list. - If the subject is not a named entity, return an empty list. - Include at least one triple where predicate is "instanceOf". - Do not get too wordy. - Separate several objects into multiple triples with one object.
Input
Subject: United States of America vs. Erhard Milch Description of subject: United States of America vs. Erhard Milch was a post–World War II Nuremberg war crimes trial in which former Luftwaffe Field Marshal Erhard Milch was prosecuted for his role in the Nazi regime’s use of forced labor and other atrocities.
Referenced by (1)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.