Reproducibility Project
E437191
The Reproducibility Project is a large-scale collaborative effort in psychology that systematically attempted to replicate published studies to assess the reliability of scientific findings.
All labels observed (1)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| Reproducibility Project canonical | 1 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T4424395 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
Target entity: Reproducibility Project Context triple: [Brian Nosek, knownFor, Reproducibility Project]
-
A.
Springer Nature Experiments
Springer Nature Experiments is an online platform by Springer Nature that provides curated, searchable experimental protocols and methods for researchers in the life and physical sciences.
-
B.
Royal Society Open Science
Royal Society Open Science is a peer-reviewed, open-access scientific journal published by the Royal Society that covers a broad range of scientific disciplines.
-
C.
Harvard Dataverse
Harvard Dataverse is a research data repository platform that enables scholars to share, publish, and preserve datasets, primarily used by the academic community.
-
D.
The Science Survey
The Science Survey is the student-run newspaper of The Bronx High School of Science, featuring news, opinion pieces, and creative work by its students.
-
E.
ResearchKit
ResearchKit is an open-source framework from Apple that enables researchers and developers to create iOS apps for conducting medical studies and collecting health-related data from participants.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Target entity: Reproducibility Project Target entity description: The Reproducibility Project is a large-scale collaborative effort in psychology that systematically attempted to replicate published studies to assess the reliability of scientific findings.
-
A.
Springer Nature Experiments
Springer Nature Experiments is an online platform by Springer Nature that provides curated, searchable experimental protocols and methods for researchers in the life and physical sciences.
-
B.
Royal Society Open Science
Royal Society Open Science is a peer-reviewed, open-access scientific journal published by the Royal Society that covers a broad range of scientific disciplines.
-
C.
Harvard Dataverse
Harvard Dataverse is a research data repository platform that enables scholars to share, publish, and preserve datasets, primarily used by the academic community.
-
D.
The Science Survey
The Science Survey is the student-run newspaper of The Bronx High School of Science, featuring news, opinion pieces, and creative work by its students.
-
E.
ResearchKit
ResearchKit is an open-source framework from Apple that enables researchers and developers to create iOS apps for conducting medical studies and collecting health-related data from participants.
- F. None of above. chosen
Statements (48)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf |
collaborative research initiative
ⓘ
meta-science project ⓘ scientific research project ⓘ |
| addresses |
overestimation of effect sizes in published literature
ⓘ
publication bias in psychological research ⓘ questionable research practices ⓘ replication crisis in psychology ⓘ |
| aim |
assess the reproducibility of psychological science
ⓘ
evaluate the reliability of published psychological findings ⓘ |
| approach | large-scale collaboration among researchers ⓘ |
| characteristic |
emphasis on methodological rigor
ⓘ
emphasis on statistical power ⓘ emphasis on transparency ⓘ large sample of target studies ⓘ multi-site collaboration ⓘ standardized evaluation of replication outcomes ⓘ |
| emphasizes |
data sharing
ⓘ
materials sharing ⓘ open science principles ⓘ pre-registration of analysis plans ⓘ |
| field | psychology ⓘ |
| focus |
cognitive psychology
ⓘ
experimental psychology ⓘ social psychology ⓘ |
| goal |
identify factors associated with replication success or failure
ⓘ
improve research practices in psychology ⓘ increase confidence in psychological science ⓘ quantify the rate of successful replications in psychology ⓘ |
| impact |
encouraged adoption of open science badges and policies
ⓘ
influenced reforms in scientific publishing practices ⓘ raised awareness of the replication crisis beyond psychology ⓘ stimulated debate about research reliability in psychology ⓘ |
| involves |
coordination across multiple countries
ⓘ
coordination across multiple institutions ⓘ many independent research teams ⓘ |
| method | systematic replication of published studies ⓘ |
| relatedTo |
credibility of empirical findings in social sciences
ⓘ
evidence-based research reform ⓘ meta-research on scientific practices ⓘ statistical power analysis in psychology ⓘ |
| resultType |
analyses of predictors of replication success
ⓘ
comparisons between original and replication effect sizes ⓘ empirical estimates of reproducibility ⓘ |
| uses |
open data practices
ⓘ
open materials sharing ⓘ pre-registered replication protocols ⓘ standardized replication procedures ⓘ transparent reporting of methods ⓘ |
How these facts were elicited
The pipeline generated the facts above by prompting gpt-5.1 with this entity's name + description and the instruction below.
You are a knowledge base construction expert. Given a subject entity and a description of it, return factual statements that you know for the subject as a JSON list of dictionaries(triples), where keys must be "subject", "predicate" and "object". The number of facts may be very high, between 25 to 50 or more, for very popular subjects. For less popular subjects, the number of facts can be very low, like 5 or 10. # Requirements - If you don't know the subject at all, return an empty list. - If the subject is not a named entity, return an empty list. - Include at least one triple where predicate is "instanceOf". - Do not get too wordy. - Separate several objects into multiple triples with one object.
Subject: Reproducibility Project Description of subject: The Reproducibility Project is a large-scale collaborative effort in psychology that systematically attempted to replicate published studies to assess the reliability of scientific findings.
Referenced by (1)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.