How Rights Went Wrong: Why Our Obsession with Rights Is Tearing America Apart
E255679
"How Rights Went Wrong: Why Our Obsession with Rights Is Tearing America Apart" is a book by legal scholar Jamal Greene that critiques the American legal system’s absolutist approach to rights and argues for a more balanced, context-sensitive way of resolving rights conflicts.
All labels observed (1)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| How Rights Went Wrong: Why Our Obsession with Rights Is Tearing America Apart canonical | 1 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T2319477 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: How Rights Went Wrong: Why Our Obsession with Rights Is Tearing America Apart Context triple: [Jamal Greene, notableWork, How Rights Went Wrong: Why Our Obsession with Rights Is Tearing America Apart]
-
A.
America (The Book): A Citizen's Guide to Democracy Inaction
"America (The Book): A Citizen's Guide to Democracy Inaction" is a satirical, textbook-style commentary on American politics and history created by Jon Stewart and the writers of The Daily Show.
-
B.
In Our Defense: The Bill of Rights in Action
In Our Defense: The Bill of Rights in Action is a nonfiction book that uses real-life court cases and stories to explain and illustrate the meaning and impact of the U.S. Bill of Rights.
-
C.
The Crisis of Democracy
The Crisis of Democracy is a 1975 report commissioned by the Trilateral Commission that analyzes the challenges posed to Western democratic governance by rising public participation and demands in the late 20th century.
-
D.
The Man Versus the State
The Man Versus the State is a political philosophy book by Herbert Spencer that critiques government intervention and defends individual liberty and limited state power.
-
E.
Caste: The Origins of Our Discontents
Caste: The Origins of Our Discontents is a nonfiction book by Isabel Wilkerson that examines the hidden caste systems shaping social hierarchy and inequality in the United States and around the world.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: How Rights Went Wrong: Why Our Obsession with Rights Is Tearing America Apart Target entity description: "How Rights Went Wrong: Why Our Obsession with Rights Is Tearing America Apart" is a book by legal scholar Jamal Greene that critiques the American legal system’s absolutist approach to rights and argues for a more balanced, context-sensitive way of resolving rights conflicts.
-
A.
America (The Book): A Citizen's Guide to Democracy Inaction
"America (The Book): A Citizen's Guide to Democracy Inaction" is a satirical, textbook-style commentary on American politics and history created by Jon Stewart and the writers of The Daily Show.
-
B.
In Our Defense: The Bill of Rights in Action
In Our Defense: The Bill of Rights in Action is a nonfiction book that uses real-life court cases and stories to explain and illustrate the meaning and impact of the U.S. Bill of Rights.
-
C.
The Crisis of Democracy
The Crisis of Democracy is a 1975 report commissioned by the Trilateral Commission that analyzes the challenges posed to Western democratic governance by rising public participation and demands in the late 20th century.
-
D.
The Man Versus the State
The Man Versus the State is a political philosophy book by Herbert Spencer that critiques government intervention and defends individual liberty and limited state power.
-
E.
Caste: The Origins of Our Discontents
Caste: The Origins of Our Discontents is a nonfiction book by Isabel Wilkerson that examines the hidden caste systems shaping social hierarchy and inequality in the United States and around the world.
- F. None of above. chosen
Statements (45)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf | book ⓘ |
| addresses |
equality and discrimination disputes
ⓘ
free speech conflicts ⓘ judicial review in the United States ⓘ religious liberty conflicts ⓘ |
| arguesAgainst |
view of rights as absolute trumps
ⓘ
zero-sum framing of rights conflicts ⓘ |
| arguesFor |
a comparative perspective that learns from other constitutional systems
ⓘ
context-sensitive adjudication of rights claims ⓘ incremental and negotiated solutions to rights disputes ⓘ |
| author | Jamal Greene ⓘ |
| countryOfPublication |
United States of America
ⓘ
surface form:
United States
|
| criticizes |
absolutist approach to constitutional rights in U.S. law
ⓘ
rights discourse that frames disputes as winners versus losers ⓘ strong judicial preference for categorical rules over balancing tests ⓘ |
| genre |
legal scholarship
ⓘ
nonfiction ⓘ political theory ⓘ |
| hasForm |
audiobook
ⓘ
e-book ⓘ printed book ⓘ |
| influencedBy |
comparative constitutional law
ⓘ
proportionality analysis used in foreign constitutional courts ⓘ |
| language | English ⓘ |
| mainSubject |
American legal system
ⓘ
civil rights ⓘ conflicts of rights ⓘ constitutional interpretation ⓘ constitutional law ⓘ judicial decision-making ⓘ rights discourse in the United States ⓘ |
| notableFor |
critique of American rights exceptionalism
ⓘ
proposal to reframe rights as tools for compromise rather than weapons of conflict ⓘ |
| proposes |
a more pluralistic understanding of rights in American constitutional law
ⓘ
a proportionality-style balancing of rights and interests ⓘ greater judicial attention to context in rights cases ⓘ |
| targetAudience |
general readers interested in constitutional issues
ⓘ
law students ⓘ legal scholars ⓘ policy makers ⓘ |
| thesis |
Absolutist rights adjudication contributes to political and social polarization in the United States.
ⓘ
Courts should adopt a more balanced, context-sensitive approach to resolving rights conflicts. ⓘ Rights should be understood as interests to be balanced rather than trumps that automatically defeat competing claims. ⓘ The American legal system treats rights in an overly absolutist, all-or-nothing way. ⓘ |
| workOf | Jamal Greene ⓘ |
How these facts were elicited
The pipeline generated the facts above by prompting gpt-5.1 with this entity's name + description and the instruction below.
Instruction
You are a knowledge base construction expert. Given a subject entity and a description of it, return factual statements that you know for the subject as a JSON list of dictionaries(triples), where keys must be "subject", "predicate" and "object". The number of facts may be very high, between 25 to 50 or more, for very popular subjects. For less popular subjects, the number of facts can be very low, like 5 or 10. # Requirements - If you don't know the subject at all, return an empty list. - If the subject is not a named entity, return an empty list. - Include at least one triple where predicate is "instanceOf". - Do not get too wordy. - Separate several objects into multiple triples with one object.
Input
Subject: How Rights Went Wrong: Why Our Obsession with Rights Is Tearing America Apart Description of subject: "How Rights Went Wrong: Why Our Obsession with Rights Is Tearing America Apart" is a book by legal scholar Jamal Greene that critiques the American legal system’s absolutist approach to rights and argues for a more balanced, context-sensitive way of resolving rights conflicts.
Referenced by (1)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.
Jamal Greene
→
notableWork
→
How Rights Went Wrong: Why Our Obsession with Rights Is Tearing America Apart
ⓘ