“Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases”
E1528226
UNEXPLORED
“Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases” is a landmark psychological work that introduced the systematic study of cognitive shortcuts and errors people make when reasoning under uncertainty, laying the foundation for the field of behavioral decision research.
All labels observed (3)
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T22273351 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
Target entity: “Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases” Context triple: [Amos Tversky, notableWork, “Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases”]
-
A.
Noise: A Flaw in Human Judgment
"Noise: A Flaw in Human Judgment" is a non-fiction book that examines the often-overlooked variability and inconsistency in human decision-making and offers strategies to reduce such errors in fields like law, medicine, and business.
-
B.
Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart
"Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart" is a book that argues people can often make better and faster decisions by using simple mental shortcuts rather than complex analytical methods.
-
C.
Gigerenzer
Gigerenzer is a German psychologist best known for his work on heuristics, decision-making under uncertainty, and the concept of "fast and frugal" reasoning.
-
D.
Models of Bounded Rationality
Models of Bounded Rationality is a collection of Herbert A. Simon’s influential works that develop the concept of bounded rationality, explaining how real-world decision-making is constrained by limited information, cognitive capacity, and time.
-
E.
Risk, Ambiguity and the Savage Axioms
"Risk, Ambiguity and the Savage Axioms" is a seminal 1961 paper by Daniel Ellsberg that challenges expected utility theory by demonstrating how people systematically prefer known risks over ambiguous ones, a phenomenon now known as the Ellsberg paradox.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Target entity: “Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases” Target entity description: “Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases” is a landmark psychological work that introduced the systematic study of cognitive shortcuts and errors people make when reasoning under uncertainty, laying the foundation for the field of behavioral decision research.
-
A.
Noise: A Flaw in Human Judgment
"Noise: A Flaw in Human Judgment" is a non-fiction book that examines the often-overlooked variability and inconsistency in human decision-making and offers strategies to reduce such errors in fields like law, medicine, and business.
-
B.
Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart
"Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart" is a book that argues people can often make better and faster decisions by using simple mental shortcuts rather than complex analytical methods.
-
C.
Gigerenzer
Gigerenzer is a German psychologist best known for his work on heuristics, decision-making under uncertainty, and the concept of "fast and frugal" reasoning.
-
D.
Models of Bounded Rationality
Models of Bounded Rationality is a collection of Herbert A. Simon’s influential works that develop the concept of bounded rationality, explaining how real-world decision-making is constrained by limited information, cognitive capacity, and time.
-
E.
Risk, Ambiguity and the Savage Axioms
"Risk, Ambiguity and the Savage Axioms" is a seminal 1961 paper by Daniel Ellsberg that challenges expected utility theory by demonstrating how people systematically prefer known risks over ambiguous ones, a phenomenon now known as the Ellsberg paradox.
- F. None of above. chosen
Referenced by (3)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.