Alexander v. Choate
E1521125
UNEXPLORED
Alexander v. Choate is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified the scope of protections against disability discrimination under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, particularly regarding neutral policies with disparate impacts on people with disabilities.
All labels observed (1)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| Alexander v. Choate canonical | 1 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T22137131 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
Target entity: Alexander v. Choate Context triple: [United States disability rights law, includesCaseLaw, Alexander v. Choate]
-
A.
Alexander v. Sandoval
Alexander v. Sandoval is a 2001 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held there is no private right of action to enforce disparate-impact regulations under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
-
B.
Lucas v. Earl
Lucas v. Earl is a landmark 1930 U.S. Supreme Court tax law case that established the principle that income is taxed to the person who earns it, regardless of contractual arrangements to split or assign that income.
-
C.
Ray v. Blair
Ray v. Blair is a 1952 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld a state's authority to require presidential electors to pledge support for their party's nominees as a condition of appointment.
-
D.
Ogden v. Saunders
Ogden v. Saunders is an 1827 U.S. Supreme Court case, known for Justice Bushrod Washington’s opinion addressing the constitutionality of state bankruptcy laws under the Contract Clause.
-
E.
Leach v. Carlile
Leach v. Carlile is a United States Supreme Court decision issued during Chief Justice Edward Douglass White’s tenure, addressing questions of federal law under the early 20th-century Court.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Target entity: Alexander v. Choate Target entity description: Alexander v. Choate is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified the scope of protections against disability discrimination under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, particularly regarding neutral policies with disparate impacts on people with disabilities.
-
A.
Alexander v. Sandoval
Alexander v. Sandoval is a 2001 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held there is no private right of action to enforce disparate-impact regulations under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
-
B.
Lucas v. Earl
Lucas v. Earl is a landmark 1930 U.S. Supreme Court tax law case that established the principle that income is taxed to the person who earns it, regardless of contractual arrangements to split or assign that income.
-
C.
Ray v. Blair
Ray v. Blair is a 1952 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld a state's authority to require presidential electors to pledge support for their party's nominees as a condition of appointment.
-
D.
Ogden v. Saunders
Ogden v. Saunders is an 1827 U.S. Supreme Court case, known for Justice Bushrod Washington’s opinion addressing the constitutionality of state bankruptcy laws under the Contract Clause.
-
E.
Leach v. Carlile
Leach v. Carlile is a United States Supreme Court decision issued during Chief Justice Edward Douglass White’s tenure, addressing questions of federal law under the early 20th-century Court.
- F. None of above. chosen
Referenced by (1)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.