Michigan v. DeFillippo

Target entity: Michigan v. DeFillippo
Context triple: [Illinois v. Krull, relatedCase, Michigan v. DeFillippo]

• A. Michigan v. Tucker
  Michigan v. Tucker is a 1974 U.S. Supreme Court decision that limited the exclusionary rule’s application to statements obtained without full Miranda warnings, holding that derivative evidence from such statements could still be admissible.
• B. Michigan v. Doran
  Michigan v. Doran is a 1978 U.S. Supreme Court decision that clarified the limited role of asylum states in reviewing extradition requests from other states under the Extradition Clause and federal statute.
• C. Michigan v. Bryant
  Michigan v. Bryant is a 2011 U.S. Supreme Court decision that further defined the scope of the Confrontation Clause by clarifying when statements made to police are considered “testimonial” and thus subject to Sixth Amendment protections.
• D. Sweet v. People of the State of Michigan
  Sweet v. People of the State of Michigan was a landmark 1925 criminal trial arising from a racially charged confrontation in Detroit, in which African American physician Ossian Sweet and others were prosecuted for murder after defending his home against a white mob.
• E. Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce
  Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce was a 1990 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld restrictions on corporate independent political expenditures under the First Amendment until it was later overturned by Citizens United.
• F. None of above. chosen
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Target entity: Michigan v. DeFillippo
Target entity description: Michigan v. DeFillippo is a U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld the validity of an arrest and search conducted under a statute later found unconstitutional, establishing that officers may rely in good faith on laws not yet invalidated.

• A. Michigan v. Tucker
  Michigan v. Tucker is a 1974 U.S. Supreme Court decision that limited the exclusionary rule’s application to statements obtained without full Miranda warnings, holding that derivative evidence from such statements could still be admissible.
• B. Michigan v. Doran
  Michigan v. Doran is a 1978 U.S. Supreme Court decision that clarified the limited role of asylum states in reviewing extradition requests from other states under the Extradition Clause and federal statute.
• C. Michigan v. Bryant
  Michigan v. Bryant is a 2011 U.S. Supreme Court decision that further defined the scope of the Confrontation Clause by clarifying when statements made to police are considered “testimonial” and thus subject to Sixth Amendment protections.
• D. Sweet v. People of the State of Michigan
  Sweet v. People of the State of Michigan was a landmark 1925 criminal trial arising from a racially charged confrontation in Detroit, in which African American physician Ossian Sweet and others were prosecuted for murder after defending his home against a white mob.
• E. Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce
  Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce was a 1990 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld restrictions on corporate independent political expenditures under the First Amendment until it was later overturned by Citizens United.
• F. None of above. chosen