United States v. Philadelphia National Bank
E1488066
UNEXPLORED
United States v. Philadelphia National Bank is a landmark 1963 U.S. Supreme Court antitrust case that established a strict standard for evaluating bank mergers under Section 7 of the Clayton Act.
All labels observed (1)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| United States v. Philadelphia National Bank canonical | 1 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T21497230 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: United States v. Philadelphia National Bank Context triple: [United States v. Von's Grocery Co., relatedCase, United States v. Philadelphia National Bank]
-
A.
Veazie Bank v. Fenno
Veazie Bank v. Fenno was an 1869 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld a federal tax on state banknotes, effectively strengthening federal control over the national currency system.
-
B.
Pollock v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.
Pollock v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. was an 1895 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down a federal income tax as unconstitutional, prompting the later adoption of the Sixteenth Amendment to authorize such taxes.
-
C.
Osborn v. Bank of the United States
Osborn v. Bank of the United States is an 1824 U.S. Supreme Court decision that affirmed federal jurisdiction over cases involving federally chartered institutions and strengthened federal authority over the states.
-
D.
Northern Securities Co. v. United States
Northern Securities Co. v. United States was a landmark 1904 U.S. Supreme Court antitrust case that broke up a major railroad holding company and strengthened federal power to regulate monopolies under the Sherman Act.
-
E.
Durousseau v. United States
Durousseau v. United States is an 1810 U.S. Supreme Court decision that clarified the scope of federal judicial power by interpreting Congress’s authority to make exceptions and regulations to the Court’s appellate jurisdiction.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: United States v. Philadelphia National Bank Target entity description: United States v. Philadelphia National Bank is a landmark 1963 U.S. Supreme Court antitrust case that established a strict standard for evaluating bank mergers under Section 7 of the Clayton Act.
-
A.
Veazie Bank v. Fenno
Veazie Bank v. Fenno was an 1869 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld a federal tax on state banknotes, effectively strengthening federal control over the national currency system.
-
B.
Pollock v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.
Pollock v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. was an 1895 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down a federal income tax as unconstitutional, prompting the later adoption of the Sixteenth Amendment to authorize such taxes.
-
C.
Osborn v. Bank of the United States
Osborn v. Bank of the United States is an 1824 U.S. Supreme Court decision that affirmed federal jurisdiction over cases involving federally chartered institutions and strengthened federal authority over the states.
-
D.
Northern Securities Co. v. United States
Northern Securities Co. v. United States was a landmark 1904 U.S. Supreme Court antitrust case that broke up a major railroad holding company and strengthened federal power to regulate monopolies under the Sherman Act.
-
E.
Durousseau v. United States
Durousseau v. United States is an 1810 U.S. Supreme Court decision that clarified the scope of federal judicial power by interpreting Congress’s authority to make exceptions and regulations to the Court’s appellate jurisdiction.
- F. None of above. chosen
Referenced by (1)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.