Arizona v. Hicks
E1470906
UNEXPLORED
Arizona v. Hicks is a 1987 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited police authority to move objects and inspect them without probable cause during a lawful search, helping define the scope of the Fourth Amendment’s protections.
All labels observed (1)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| Arizona v. Hicks canonical | 1 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T21190025 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Arizona v. Hicks Context triple: [Minnesota v. Dickerson, relatedCase, Arizona v. Hicks]
-
A.
Arizona v. Evans
Arizona v. Evans is a 1995 U.S. Supreme Court case that extended the good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule to evidence obtained through an arrest based on erroneous computer records.
-
B.
Arizona v. Fulminante
Arizona v. Fulminante is a landmark 1991 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held a coerced confession can be treated as trial error subject to harmless-error analysis rather than as automatically requiring reversal of a conviction.
-
C.
Arizona v. Johnson
Arizona v. Johnson is a 2009 U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified police authority to frisk passengers during lawful traffic stops when officers reasonably suspect they are armed and dangerous.
-
D.
Arizona v. United States
Arizona v. United States is a 2012 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited state authority over immigration enforcement by affirming broad federal power in this area.
-
E.
Gonzales v. Arizona
Gonzales v. Arizona is a U.S. Supreme Court case that addressed the constitutionality of Arizona’s voter identification and proof-of-citizenship requirements for voter registration and voting.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Arizona v. Hicks Target entity description: Arizona v. Hicks is a 1987 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited police authority to move objects and inspect them without probable cause during a lawful search, helping define the scope of the Fourth Amendment’s protections.
-
A.
Arizona v. Evans
Arizona v. Evans is a 1995 U.S. Supreme Court case that extended the good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule to evidence obtained through an arrest based on erroneous computer records.
-
B.
Arizona v. Fulminante
Arizona v. Fulminante is a landmark 1991 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held a coerced confession can be treated as trial error subject to harmless-error analysis rather than as automatically requiring reversal of a conviction.
-
C.
Arizona v. Johnson
Arizona v. Johnson is a 2009 U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified police authority to frisk passengers during lawful traffic stops when officers reasonably suspect they are armed and dangerous.
-
D.
Arizona v. United States
Arizona v. United States is a 2012 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited state authority over immigration enforcement by affirming broad federal power in this area.
-
E.
Gonzales v. Arizona
Gonzales v. Arizona is a U.S. Supreme Court case that addressed the constitutionality of Arizona’s voter identification and proof-of-citizenship requirements for voter registration and voting.
- F. None of above. chosen
Referenced by (1)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.