Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. Tornillo

Target entity: Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. Tornillo
Context triple: [First Amendment free press theory (United States), relatedToCaseLaw, Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. Tornillo]

• A. New York Times Co. v. Sullivan
  New York Times Co. v. Sullivan is a landmark 1964 U.S. Supreme Court decision that established the “actual malice” standard, greatly expanding First Amendment protections for the press in defamation cases involving public officials.
• B. United States v. Washington Post Co.
  United States v. Washington Post Co. is a landmark 1971 U.S. Supreme Court case that, alongside New York Times Co. v. United States, upheld the press’s right to publish the Pentagon Papers against prior restraint by the government.
• C. United States v. Callender
  United States v. Callender was a prominent 1800 Sedition Act prosecution of journalist James Thomson Callender that became historically significant for the controversial conduct of Supreme Court Justice Samuel Chase during the trial.
• D. City of Boerne v. Flores
  City of Boerne v. Flores is a 1997 U.S. Supreme Court case that curtailed Congress’s power under the Fourteenth Amendment and held that the Religious Freedom Restoration Act could not be applied to the states.
• E. Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire
  Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire is a 1942 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the "fighting words" doctrine, holding that certain personally abusive epithets are not protected by the First Amendment.
• F. None of above. chosen
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Target entity: Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. Tornillo
Target entity description: Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. Tornillo is a landmark 1974 U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down a Florida "right of reply" law and strongly affirmed the press’s editorial autonomy under the First Amendment.

• A. New York Times Co. v. Sullivan
  New York Times Co. v. Sullivan is a landmark 1964 U.S. Supreme Court decision that established the “actual malice” standard, greatly expanding First Amendment protections for the press in defamation cases involving public officials.
• B. United States v. Washington Post Co.
  United States v. Washington Post Co. is a landmark 1971 U.S. Supreme Court case that, alongside New York Times Co. v. United States, upheld the press’s right to publish the Pentagon Papers against prior restraint by the government.
• C. United States v. Callender
  United States v. Callender was a prominent 1800 Sedition Act prosecution of journalist James Thomson Callender that became historically significant for the controversial conduct of Supreme Court Justice Samuel Chase during the trial.
• D. City of Boerne v. Flores
  City of Boerne v. Flores is a 1997 U.S. Supreme Court case that curtailed Congress’s power under the Fourteenth Amendment and held that the Religious Freedom Restoration Act could not be applied to the states.
• E. Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire
  Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire is a 1942 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the "fighting words" doctrine, holding that certain personally abusive epithets are not protected by the First Amendment.
• F. None of above. chosen