Trump v. Hawaii
E1435766
UNEXPLORED
Trump v. Hawaii is a 2018 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld President Donald Trump’s travel ban targeting several predominantly Muslim countries, addressing the scope of executive power over immigration and national security.
All labels observed (1)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| Trump v. Hawaii canonical | 1 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T20532621 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Trump v. Hawaii Context triple: [Roberts Court, landmarkCase, Trump v. Hawaii]
-
A.
Trump v. Vance
Trump v. Vance is a 2020 U.S. Supreme Court case that held a sitting president is not absolutely immune from state criminal subpoenas, allowing a New York grand jury to obtain Donald Trump’s financial records.
-
B.
Puerto Rico v. Branstad
Puerto Rico v. Branstad is a 1987 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held federal courts can compel state governors to comply with interstate extradition requests under the Constitution.
-
C.
United States v. Alvarez
United States v. Alvarez is a 2012 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down the Stolen Valor Act’s criminalization of lying about receiving military honors as a violation of the First Amendment’s free speech protections.
-
D.
Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee
Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee is a 2021 U.S. Supreme Court decision that significantly narrowed the scope of federal protections against voting discrimination, particularly under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act.
-
E.
Washington v. Texas
Washington v. Texas is a 1967 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held criminal defendants have a constitutional right to obtain testimony from favorable witnesses, incorporating the Compulsory Process Clause against the states.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Trump v. Hawaii Target entity description: Trump v. Hawaii is a 2018 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld President Donald Trump’s travel ban targeting several predominantly Muslim countries, addressing the scope of executive power over immigration and national security.
-
A.
Trump v. Vance
Trump v. Vance is a 2020 U.S. Supreme Court case that held a sitting president is not absolutely immune from state criminal subpoenas, allowing a New York grand jury to obtain Donald Trump’s financial records.
-
B.
Puerto Rico v. Branstad
Puerto Rico v. Branstad is a 1987 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held federal courts can compel state governors to comply with interstate extradition requests under the Constitution.
-
C.
United States v. Alvarez
United States v. Alvarez is a 2012 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down the Stolen Valor Act’s criminalization of lying about receiving military honors as a violation of the First Amendment’s free speech protections.
-
D.
Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee
Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee is a 2021 U.S. Supreme Court decision that significantly narrowed the scope of federal protections against voting discrimination, particularly under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act.
-
E.
Washington v. Texas
Washington v. Texas is a 1967 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held criminal defendants have a constitutional right to obtain testimony from favorable witnesses, incorporating the Compulsory Process Clause against the states.
- F. None of above. chosen
Referenced by (1)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.