Steve Jackson Games, Inc. v. United States Secret Service
E1417189
UNEXPLORED
Steve Jackson Games, Inc. v. United States Secret Service is a landmark 1994 U.S. federal court case that addressed government overreach in electronic searches and seizures, helping to define legal protections for electronic communications and digital privacy.
All labels observed (1)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| Steve Jackson Games, Inc. v. United States Secret Service canonical | 1 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T20178836 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Steve Jackson Games, Inc. v. United States Secret Service Context triple: [Steve Jackson Games, legalCase, Steve Jackson Games, Inc. v. United States Secret Service]
-
A.
United States v. Gementera
United States v. Gementera is a federal appellate case known for upholding a controversial shaming-based condition of supervised release imposed on a mail thief, raising significant debate about the limits of creative sentencing under the Eighth Amendment.
-
B.
United States v. Clarke
United States v. Clarke is a 2014 U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified when a taxpayer is entitled to an evidentiary hearing to challenge the Internal Revenue Service’s reasons for issuing a summons.
-
C.
United States v. Dennett
United States v. Dennett was a landmark 1930 U.S. obscenity case in which birth control advocate Mary Ware Dennett successfully challenged federal censorship of her sex education pamphlet, helping to expand protections for educational and reformist materials.
-
D.
United States v. Alvarez
United States v. Alvarez is a 2012 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down the Stolen Valor Act’s criminalization of lying about receiving military honors as a violation of the First Amendment’s free speech protections.
-
E.
United States v. Classic
United States v. Classic is a 1941 U.S. Supreme Court decision that expanded federal authority over primary elections by holding that Congress can regulate primaries when they are an integral part of the electoral process for federal offices.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Steve Jackson Games, Inc. v. United States Secret Service Target entity description: Steve Jackson Games, Inc. v. United States Secret Service is a landmark 1994 U.S. federal court case that addressed government overreach in electronic searches and seizures, helping to define legal protections for electronic communications and digital privacy.
-
A.
United States v. Gementera
United States v. Gementera is a federal appellate case known for upholding a controversial shaming-based condition of supervised release imposed on a mail thief, raising significant debate about the limits of creative sentencing under the Eighth Amendment.
-
B.
United States v. Clarke
United States v. Clarke is a 2014 U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified when a taxpayer is entitled to an evidentiary hearing to challenge the Internal Revenue Service’s reasons for issuing a summons.
-
C.
United States v. Dennett
United States v. Dennett was a landmark 1930 U.S. obscenity case in which birth control advocate Mary Ware Dennett successfully challenged federal censorship of her sex education pamphlet, helping to expand protections for educational and reformist materials.
-
D.
United States v. Alvarez
United States v. Alvarez is a 2012 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down the Stolen Valor Act’s criminalization of lying about receiving military honors as a violation of the First Amendment’s free speech protections.
-
E.
United States v. Classic
United States v. Classic is a 1941 U.S. Supreme Court decision that expanded federal authority over primary elections by holding that Congress can regulate primaries when they are an integral part of the electoral process for federal offices.
- F. None of above. chosen
Referenced by (1)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.