Haywood–Moyer–Pettibone trial

Target entity: Haywood–Moyer–Pettibone trial
Context triple: [Western Federation of Miners, notable event, Haywood–Moyer–Pettibone trial]

• A. Homma trial
  The Homma trial was a post–World War II U.S. military tribunal that prosecuted Japanese General Masaharu Homma for war crimes committed by his forces against American and Filipino prisoners in the Philippines.
• B. Durousseau v. United States
  Durousseau v. United States is an 1810 U.S. Supreme Court decision that clarified the scope of federal judicial power by interpreting Congress’s authority to make exceptions and regulations to the Court’s appellate jurisdiction.
• C. Yates v. United States
  Yates v. United States is a 1957 U.S. Supreme Court decision that significantly narrowed the application of the Smith Act by distinguishing between the advocacy of abstract doctrine and the advocacy of concrete action to overthrow the government.
• D. Adair v. United States
  Adair v. United States is a 1908 U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down a federal law protecting railroad workers’ union membership, holding that it violated employers’ freedom of contract under the Fifth Amendment.
• E. Pohl Case
  The Pohl Case was one of the Subsequent Nuremberg Trials in which Oswald Pohl and other SS officials were prosecuted for their roles in administering Nazi concentration camps and exploiting forced labor.
• F. None of above. chosen
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Target entity: Haywood–Moyer–Pettibone trial
Target entity description: The Haywood–Moyer–Pettibone trial was a highly publicized early 20th-century U.S. court case in which leaders of the Western Federation of Miners were controversially prosecuted for the assassination of former Idaho Governor Frank Steunenberg, becoming a landmark episode in American labor and legal history.

• A. Homma trial
  The Homma trial was a post–World War II U.S. military tribunal that prosecuted Japanese General Masaharu Homma for war crimes committed by his forces against American and Filipino prisoners in the Philippines.
• B. Durousseau v. United States
  Durousseau v. United States is an 1810 U.S. Supreme Court decision that clarified the scope of federal judicial power by interpreting Congress’s authority to make exceptions and regulations to the Court’s appellate jurisdiction.
• C. Yates v. United States
  Yates v. United States is a 1957 U.S. Supreme Court decision that significantly narrowed the application of the Smith Act by distinguishing between the advocacy of abstract doctrine and the advocacy of concrete action to overthrow the government.
• D. Adair v. United States
  Adair v. United States is a 1908 U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down a federal law protecting railroad workers’ union membership, holding that it violated employers’ freedom of contract under the Fifth Amendment.
• E. Pohl Case
  The Pohl Case was one of the Subsequent Nuremberg Trials in which Oswald Pohl and other SS officials were prosecuted for their roles in administering Nazi concentration camps and exploiting forced labor.
• F. None of above. chosen