James v. Marinship Corp.
E1307251
UNEXPLORED
James v. Marinship Corp. is a landmark 1944 California Supreme Court case that held racially discriminatory union practices in a wartime shipyard unlawful, advancing civil rights and fair employment principles.
All labels observed (1)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| James v. Marinship Corp. canonical | 1 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T18112080 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: James v. Marinship Corp. Context triple: [Marinship shipyards, legalCaseAssociated, James v. Marinship Corp.]
-
A.
Wards Cove Packing Co. v. Atonio
Wards Cove Packing Co. v. Atonio is a 1989 U.S. Supreme Court case that narrowed the standards for proving employment discrimination under Title VII, prompting Congress to later revise those standards in the Civil Rights Act of 1991.
-
B.
United States v. Carroll Towing Co.
United States v. Carroll Towing Co. is a landmark 1947 U.S. federal court case famous for Judge Learned Hand’s formulation of the “Hand formula” for determining negligence in tort law.
-
C.
Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer
Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer is a landmark 1952 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited presidential power by ruling that President Truman lacked authority to seize steel mills during the Korean War without congressional approval.
-
D.
Huus v. New York & Porto Rico Steamship Co.
Huus v. New York & Porto Rico Steamship Co. is a U.S. Supreme Court case associated with the Insular Cases that addressed legal issues arising from the status and governance of newly acquired American territories.
-
E.
MacPherson v. Buick Motor Co.
MacPherson v. Buick Motor Co. is a landmark 1916 New York Court of Appeals case that expanded manufacturers’ liability in negligence to consumers, even without privity of contract.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: James v. Marinship Corp. Target entity description: James v. Marinship Corp. is a landmark 1944 California Supreme Court case that held racially discriminatory union practices in a wartime shipyard unlawful, advancing civil rights and fair employment principles.
-
A.
Wards Cove Packing Co. v. Atonio
Wards Cove Packing Co. v. Atonio is a 1989 U.S. Supreme Court case that narrowed the standards for proving employment discrimination under Title VII, prompting Congress to later revise those standards in the Civil Rights Act of 1991.
-
B.
United States v. Carroll Towing Co.
United States v. Carroll Towing Co. is a landmark 1947 U.S. federal court case famous for Judge Learned Hand’s formulation of the “Hand formula” for determining negligence in tort law.
-
C.
Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer
Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer is a landmark 1952 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited presidential power by ruling that President Truman lacked authority to seize steel mills during the Korean War without congressional approval.
-
D.
Huus v. New York & Porto Rico Steamship Co.
Huus v. New York & Porto Rico Steamship Co. is a U.S. Supreme Court case associated with the Insular Cases that addressed legal issues arising from the status and governance of newly acquired American territories.
-
E.
MacPherson v. Buick Motor Co.
MacPherson v. Buick Motor Co. is a landmark 1916 New York Court of Appeals case that expanded manufacturers’ liability in negligence to consumers, even without privity of contract.
- F. None of above. chosen
Referenced by (1)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.