Felker v. Turpin
E1280594
UNEXPLORED
Felker v. Turpin is a 1996 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld key provisions of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act, particularly regarding limits on successive habeas corpus petitions and Congress’s power over the Court’s appellate jurisdiction.
All labels observed (1)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| Felker v. Turpin canonical | 2 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T17650741 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Felker v. Turpin Context triple: [Exceptions and Regulations Clause, interpretedInCase, Felker v. Turpin]
-
A.
Hensley v. Eckerhart
Hensley v. Eckerhart is a landmark 1983 U.S. Supreme Court decision that established the modern standard for determining reasonable attorney’s fee awards for prevailing parties in civil rights litigation.
-
B.
Lafler v. Cooper
Lafler v. Cooper is a 2012 U.S. Supreme Court case that held defendants can obtain relief for ineffective assistance of counsel during plea bargaining when bad legal advice leads them to reject a favorable plea offer.
-
C.
Calder v. Bull
Calder v. Bull is an 1798 U.S. Supreme Court decision that defined the limited scope of the Constitution’s Ex Post Facto Clause, holding that it applies only to criminal, not civil, laws.
-
D.
Aguilar v. Felton
Aguilar v. Felton was a 1985 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held it unconstitutional for public school teachers to provide remedial education on the premises of religious schools under a federal aid program, based on Establishment Clause concerns.
-
E.
Argersinger v. Hamlin
Argersinger v. Hamlin is a 1972 U.S. Supreme Court case that extended the right to counsel to defendants in misdemeanor cases that may result in imprisonment.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Felker v. Turpin Target entity description: Felker v. Turpin is a 1996 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld key provisions of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act, particularly regarding limits on successive habeas corpus petitions and Congress’s power over the Court’s appellate jurisdiction.
-
A.
Hensley v. Eckerhart
Hensley v. Eckerhart is a landmark 1983 U.S. Supreme Court decision that established the modern standard for determining reasonable attorney’s fee awards for prevailing parties in civil rights litigation.
-
B.
Lafler v. Cooper
Lafler v. Cooper is a 2012 U.S. Supreme Court case that held defendants can obtain relief for ineffective assistance of counsel during plea bargaining when bad legal advice leads them to reject a favorable plea offer.
-
C.
Calder v. Bull
Calder v. Bull is an 1798 U.S. Supreme Court decision that defined the limited scope of the Constitution’s Ex Post Facto Clause, holding that it applies only to criminal, not civil, laws.
-
D.
Aguilar v. Felton
Aguilar v. Felton was a 1985 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held it unconstitutional for public school teachers to provide remedial education on the premises of religious schools under a federal aid program, based on Establishment Clause concerns.
-
E.
Argersinger v. Hamlin
Argersinger v. Hamlin is a 1972 U.S. Supreme Court case that extended the right to counsel to defendants in misdemeanor cases that may result in imprisonment.
- F. None of above. chosen
Referenced by (2)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.
subject linked to:
the Exceptions and Regulations Clause