The First Amendment prohibits the government from restricting corporate independent expenditures related to ballot initiatives based on the corporate identity of the speaker.
E1270346
UNEXPLORED
This entity is a constitutional law principle, established in First National Bank of Boston v. Bellotti, recognizing that corporations have First Amendment protection to spend independently on ballot initiatives regardless of their corporate status.
All labels observed (1)
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T17480225 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: The First Amendment prohibits the government from restricting corporate independent expenditures related to ballot initiatives based on the corporate identity of the speaker. Context triple: [First National Bank of Boston v. Bellotti, holding, The First Amendment prohibits the government from restricting corporate independent expenditures related to ballot initiatives based on the corporate identity of the speaker.]
-
A.
United States federal campaign finance law
United States federal campaign finance law is the body of statutes and regulations that governs how money is raised and spent in federal elections, including rules on contributions, disclosures, and political spending by individuals, parties, and organizations.
-
B.
McConnell v. Federal Election Commission
McConnell v. Federal Election Commission is a 2003 U.S. Supreme Court case that largely upheld the constitutionality of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (McCain–Feingold Act), significantly shaping modern campaign finance law.
-
C.
Incorporation doctrine
The Incorporation doctrine is a constitutional principle through which most protections in the U.S. Bill of Rights have been made enforceable against state governments via the Fourteenth Amendment.
-
D.
Buckley v. Valeo
Buckley v. Valeo is a landmark 1976 U.S. Supreme Court decision that reshaped campaign finance law by equating certain limits on political spending with restrictions on free speech under the First Amendment.
-
E.
McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission
McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission is a 2014 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down aggregate limits on individual contributions to federal political campaigns as a violation of the First Amendment.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: The First Amendment prohibits the government from restricting corporate independent expenditures related to ballot initiatives based on the corporate identity of the speaker. Target entity description: This entity is a constitutional law principle, established in First National Bank of Boston v. Bellotti, recognizing that corporations have First Amendment protection to spend independently on ballot initiatives regardless of their corporate status.
-
A.
United States federal campaign finance law
United States federal campaign finance law is the body of statutes and regulations that governs how money is raised and spent in federal elections, including rules on contributions, disclosures, and political spending by individuals, parties, and organizations.
-
B.
McConnell v. Federal Election Commission
McConnell v. Federal Election Commission is a 2003 U.S. Supreme Court case that largely upheld the constitutionality of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (McCain–Feingold Act), significantly shaping modern campaign finance law.
-
C.
Incorporation doctrine
The Incorporation doctrine is a constitutional principle through which most protections in the U.S. Bill of Rights have been made enforceable against state governments via the Fourteenth Amendment.
-
D.
Buckley v. Valeo
Buckley v. Valeo is a landmark 1976 U.S. Supreme Court decision that reshaped campaign finance law by equating certain limits on political spending with restrictions on free speech under the First Amendment.
-
E.
McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission
McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission is a 2014 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down aggregate limits on individual contributions to federal political campaigns as a violation of the First Amendment.
- F. None of above. chosen
Referenced by (1)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.
First National Bank of Boston v. Bellotti
→
holding
→
The First Amendment prohibits the government from restricting corporate independent expenditures related to ballot initiatives based on the corporate identity of the speaker.
ⓘ