Pearson v. Callahan, 555 U.S. 223 (2009)

Target entity: Pearson v. Callahan, 555 U.S. 223 (2009)
Context triple: [Harlow v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 800 (1982), citationInLaterCases, Pearson v. Callahan, 555 U.S. 223 (2009)]

• A. Eldred v. Ashcroft
  Eldred v. Ashcroft is a 2003 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the constitutionality of extending copyright terms, affirming Congress’s broad power over copyright duration.
• B. McCullen v. Coakley
  McCullen v. Coakley is a 2014 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down Massachusetts’ abortion-clinic buffer zone law as violating the First Amendment’s free speech protections.
• C. League of United Latin American Citizens v. Perry
  League of United Latin American Citizens v. Perry is a 2006 U.S. Supreme Court case that examined the constitutionality of Texas’s congressional redistricting plan, particularly its implications for Latino voting rights and partisan gerrymandering.
• D. Garcetti v. Ceballos
  Garcetti v. Ceballos is a 2006 U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that public employees do not have First Amendment protection for speech made pursuant to their official job duties.
• E. Perry v. Schwarzenegger
  Perry v. Schwarzenegger was the landmark federal district court case that first struck down California’s Proposition 8 same-sex marriage ban as unconstitutional under the U.S. Constitution.
• F. None of above. chosen
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Target entity: Pearson v. Callahan, 555 U.S. 223 (2009)
Target entity description: Pearson v. Callahan, 555 U.S. 223 (2009), is a U.S. Supreme Court decision that reshaped the qualified immunity doctrine by allowing courts discretion in the order of addressing constitutional and immunity questions.

• A. Eldred v. Ashcroft
  Eldred v. Ashcroft is a 2003 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the constitutionality of extending copyright terms, affirming Congress’s broad power over copyright duration.
• B. McCullen v. Coakley
  McCullen v. Coakley is a 2014 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down Massachusetts’ abortion-clinic buffer zone law as violating the First Amendment’s free speech protections.
• C. League of United Latin American Citizens v. Perry
  League of United Latin American Citizens v. Perry is a 2006 U.S. Supreme Court case that examined the constitutionality of Texas’s congressional redistricting plan, particularly its implications for Latino voting rights and partisan gerrymandering.
• D. Garcetti v. Ceballos
  Garcetti v. Ceballos is a 2006 U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that public employees do not have First Amendment protection for speech made pursuant to their official job duties.
• E. Perry v. Schwarzenegger
  Perry v. Schwarzenegger was the landmark federal district court case that first struck down California’s Proposition 8 same-sex marriage ban as unconstitutional under the U.S. Constitution.
• F. None of above. chosen