Saucier v. Katz, 533 U.S. 194 (2001)

Target entity: Saucier v. Katz, 533 U.S. 194 (2001)
Context triple: [Harlow v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 800 (1982), citationInLaterCases, Saucier v. Katz, 533 U.S. 194 (2001)]

• A. Ogden v. Saunders
  Ogden v. Saunders is an 1827 U.S. Supreme Court case, known for Justice Bushrod Washington’s opinion addressing the constitutionality of state bankruptcy laws under the Contract Clause.
• B. Central Virginia Community College v. Katz
  Central Virginia Community College v. Katz is a 2006 U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that states lack sovereign immunity in certain bankruptcy proceedings, allowing bankruptcy trustees to pursue avoidance actions against state entities.
• C. Garcetti v. Ceballos
  Garcetti v. Ceballos is a 2006 U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that public employees do not have First Amendment protection for speech made pursuant to their official job duties.
• D. Cutter v. Wilkinson
  Cutter v. Wilkinson is a 2005 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the constitutionality of the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act as applied to the religious rights of prison inmates.
• E. R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul
  R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul is a landmark 1992 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down a local hate-speech ordinance as unconstitutional viewpoint discrimination under the First Amendment.
• F. None of above. chosen
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Target entity: Saucier v. Katz, 533 U.S. 194 (2001)
Target entity description: Saucier v. Katz, 533 U.S. 194 (2001), is a U.S. Supreme Court decision that refined the qualified immunity doctrine by establishing a mandatory two-step sequence for courts to determine whether a government official is shielded from liability for alleged constitutional violations.

• A. Ogden v. Saunders
  Ogden v. Saunders is an 1827 U.S. Supreme Court case, known for Justice Bushrod Washington’s opinion addressing the constitutionality of state bankruptcy laws under the Contract Clause.
• B. Central Virginia Community College v. Katz
  Central Virginia Community College v. Katz is a 2006 U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that states lack sovereign immunity in certain bankruptcy proceedings, allowing bankruptcy trustees to pursue avoidance actions against state entities.
• C. Garcetti v. Ceballos
  Garcetti v. Ceballos is a 2006 U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that public employees do not have First Amendment protection for speech made pursuant to their official job duties.
• D. Cutter v. Wilkinson
  Cutter v. Wilkinson is a 2005 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the constitutionality of the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act as applied to the religious rights of prison inmates.
• E. R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul
  R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul is a landmark 1992 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down a local hate-speech ordinance as unconstitutional viewpoint discrimination under the First Amendment.
• F. None of above. chosen