Anderson v. Creighton, 483 U.S. 635 (1987)
E1222634
UNEXPLORED
Anderson v. Creighton, 483 U.S. 635 (1987), is a U.S. Supreme Court decision that refined the qualified immunity doctrine by holding that government officials are shielded from liability unless they violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights defined with particularized specificity.
All labels observed (1)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| Anderson v. Creighton, 483 U.S. 635 (1987) canonical | 1 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T16599935 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
Target entity: Anderson v. Creighton, 483 U.S. 635 (1987) Context triple: [Harlow v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 800 (1982), citationInLaterCases, Anderson v. Creighton, 483 U.S. 635 (1987)]
-
A.
Regan v. Wald
Regan v. Wald is a 1984 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld federal restrictions on travel to Cuba, affirming broad executive authority over foreign affairs and economic sanctions.
-
B.
Eisenstadt v. Baird
Eisenstadt v. Baird is a landmark 1972 U.S. Supreme Court decision that extended the right to possess and use contraceptives to unmarried individuals, significantly advancing privacy and equal protection jurisprudence.
-
C.
Planned Parenthood v. Danforth
Planned Parenthood v. Danforth was a 1976 U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down several Missouri abortion restrictions, including spousal and parental consent requirements, as unconstitutional.
-
D.
Lee v. Weisman
Lee v. Weisman is a 1992 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held clergy-led prayer at public school graduation ceremonies unconstitutional under the Establishment Clause.
-
E.
Jacobellis v. Ohio
Jacobellis v. Ohio is a 1964 U.S. Supreme Court decision that refined the constitutional standards for obscenity under the First Amendment, famously associated with Justice Potter Stewart’s “I know it when I see it” concurrence.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Target entity: Anderson v. Creighton, 483 U.S. 635 (1987) Target entity description: Anderson v. Creighton, 483 U.S. 635 (1987), is a U.S. Supreme Court decision that refined the qualified immunity doctrine by holding that government officials are shielded from liability unless they violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights defined with particularized specificity.
-
A.
Regan v. Wald
Regan v. Wald is a 1984 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld federal restrictions on travel to Cuba, affirming broad executive authority over foreign affairs and economic sanctions.
-
B.
Eisenstadt v. Baird
Eisenstadt v. Baird is a landmark 1972 U.S. Supreme Court decision that extended the right to possess and use contraceptives to unmarried individuals, significantly advancing privacy and equal protection jurisprudence.
-
C.
Planned Parenthood v. Danforth
Planned Parenthood v. Danforth was a 1976 U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down several Missouri abortion restrictions, including spousal and parental consent requirements, as unconstitutional.
-
D.
Lee v. Weisman
Lee v. Weisman is a 1992 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held clergy-led prayer at public school graduation ceremonies unconstitutional under the Establishment Clause.
-
E.
Jacobellis v. Ohio
Jacobellis v. Ohio is a 1964 U.S. Supreme Court decision that refined the constitutional standards for obscenity under the First Amendment, famously associated with Justice Potter Stewart’s “I know it when I see it” concurrence.
- F. None of above. chosen
Referenced by (1)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.