Wallace v. Kato
E1222316
UNEXPLORED
Wallace v. Kato is a 2007 U.S. Supreme Court decision that clarified when the statute of limitations begins to run for federal civil rights claims challenging unlawful arrests under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
All labels observed (1)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| Wallace v. Kato canonical | 1 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T16600028 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Wallace v. Kato Context triple: [Heck v. Humphrey, precedentFor, Wallace v. Kato]
-
A.
Chiafalo v. Washington
Chiafalo v. Washington is a 2020 U.S. Supreme Court case that unanimously upheld states’ authority to penalize or replace “faithless electors” who do not vote in line with their state’s popular vote in presidential elections.
-
B.
Ex parte Siebold
Ex parte Siebold is an 1879 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld federal authority to regulate and enforce laws governing federal elections, affirming broad congressional power over the electoral process.
-
C.
Lucas v. Earl
Lucas v. Earl is a landmark 1930 U.S. Supreme Court tax law case that established the principle that income is taxed to the person who earns it, regardless of contractual arrangements to split or assign that income.
-
D.
Gooding v. Wilson
Gooding v. Wilson is a 1972 U.S. Supreme Court case that narrowed the “fighting words” doctrine and struck down a Georgia statute as unconstitutionally overbroad under the First Amendment.
-
E.
International Shoe Co. v. Washington
International Shoe Co. v. Washington is a landmark 1945 U.S. Supreme Court decision that established the modern "minimum contacts" standard for determining when a state may exercise personal jurisdiction over an out-of-state defendant.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Wallace v. Kato Target entity description: Wallace v. Kato is a 2007 U.S. Supreme Court decision that clarified when the statute of limitations begins to run for federal civil rights claims challenging unlawful arrests under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
-
A.
Chiafalo v. Washington
Chiafalo v. Washington is a 2020 U.S. Supreme Court case that unanimously upheld states’ authority to penalize or replace “faithless electors” who do not vote in line with their state’s popular vote in presidential elections.
-
B.
Ex parte Siebold
Ex parte Siebold is an 1879 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld federal authority to regulate and enforce laws governing federal elections, affirming broad congressional power over the electoral process.
-
C.
Lucas v. Earl
Lucas v. Earl is a landmark 1930 U.S. Supreme Court tax law case that established the principle that income is taxed to the person who earns it, regardless of contractual arrangements to split or assign that income.
-
D.
Gooding v. Wilson
Gooding v. Wilson is a 1972 U.S. Supreme Court case that narrowed the “fighting words” doctrine and struck down a Georgia statute as unconstitutionally overbroad under the First Amendment.
-
E.
International Shoe Co. v. Washington
International Shoe Co. v. Washington is a landmark 1945 U.S. Supreme Court decision that established the modern "minimum contacts" standard for determining when a state may exercise personal jurisdiction over an out-of-state defendant.
- F. None of above. chosen
Referenced by (1)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.
subject surface form:
Heck v. Humphrey