Goldman v Silverman
E1199126
UNEXPLORED
Goldman v Silverman is a short film directed by Sebastian Bear-McClard that follows two costumed street performers in Times Square whose rivalry escalates into a surreal, darkly comic confrontation.
All labels observed (1)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| Goldman v Silverman canonical | 3 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T16190685 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Goldman v Silverman Context triple: [Sebastian Bear-McClard, notableWork, Goldman v Silverman]
-
A.
Goldman v. United States
Goldman v. United States is a 1942 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld warrantless electronic eavesdropping based on a narrow, property-based interpretation of the Fourth Amendment, later limited by the Court’s shift to a privacy-based approach.
-
B.
Rostker v. Goldberg
Rostker v. Goldberg is a 1981 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the constitutionality of requiring only men, and not women, to register for the military draft.
-
C.
Gittes vs. Gittes
Gittes vs. Gittes was a proposed but never produced third film intended to continue the Chinatown neo-noir saga centered on private investigator J.J. Gittes.
-
D.
Goldberg v. Kelly
Goldberg v. Kelly is a landmark 1970 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held welfare recipients are entitled to an evidentiary hearing before their benefits are terminated, significantly expanding procedural due process protections.
-
E.
Connick v. Myers
Connick v. Myers is a 1983 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited public employees’ First Amendment protections by holding that their speech is only constitutionally protected when it addresses matters of public concern rather than personal workplace grievances.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Goldman v Silverman Target entity description: Goldman v Silverman is a short film directed by Sebastian Bear-McClard that follows two costumed street performers in Times Square whose rivalry escalates into a surreal, darkly comic confrontation.
-
A.
Goldman v. United States
Goldman v. United States is a 1942 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld warrantless electronic eavesdropping based on a narrow, property-based interpretation of the Fourth Amendment, later limited by the Court’s shift to a privacy-based approach.
-
B.
Rostker v. Goldberg
Rostker v. Goldberg is a 1981 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the constitutionality of requiring only men, and not women, to register for the military draft.
-
C.
Gittes vs. Gittes
Gittes vs. Gittes was a proposed but never produced third film intended to continue the Chinatown neo-noir saga centered on private investigator J.J. Gittes.
-
D.
Goldberg v. Kelly
Goldberg v. Kelly is a landmark 1970 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held welfare recipients are entitled to an evidentiary hearing before their benefits are terminated, significantly expanding procedural due process protections.
-
E.
Connick v. Myers
Connick v. Myers is a 1983 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited public employees’ First Amendment protections by holding that their speech is only constitutionally protected when it addresses matters of public concern rather than personal workplace grievances.
- F. None of above. chosen
Referenced by (3)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.