United States v. Texas (2016 immigration case)
E1194234
UNEXPLORED
United States v. Texas (2016 immigration case) was a U.S. Supreme Court case that resulted in a 4–4 deadlock over the legality of the Obama administration’s Deferred Action for Parents of Americans (DAPA) immigration program, leaving a lower court’s nationwide injunction in place.
All labels observed (1)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| United States v. Texas (2016 immigration case) canonical | 1 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T16102020 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: United States v. Texas (2016 immigration case) Context triple: [Donald B. Verrilli Jr., notableCase, United States v. Texas (2016 immigration case)]
-
A.
United States v. Texas (2021)
United States v. Texas (2021) is a U.S. Supreme Court case challenging the constitutionality and enforcement mechanism of Texas’s restrictive abortion law known as Senate Bill 8.
-
B.
Washington v. Texas
Washington v. Texas is a 1967 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held criminal defendants have a constitutional right to obtain testimony from favorable witnesses, incorporating the Compulsory Process Clause against the states.
-
C.
Texas v. White
Texas v. White was an 1869 U.S. Supreme Court case that held the Union to be indestructible and that states could not unilaterally secede from it.
-
D.
United States v. Texas (1896)
United States v. Texas (1896) was a U.S. Supreme Court case that addressed a boundary dispute involving the State of Texas and the federal government over territory along what is now the Texas–Oklahoma state line.
-
E.
California v. Texas
California v. Texas is a U.S. Supreme Court case that challenged the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act after Congress reduced the individual mandate penalty to zero.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: United States v. Texas (2016 immigration case) Target entity description: United States v. Texas (2016 immigration case) was a U.S. Supreme Court case that resulted in a 4–4 deadlock over the legality of the Obama administration’s Deferred Action for Parents of Americans (DAPA) immigration program, leaving a lower court’s nationwide injunction in place.
-
A.
United States v. Texas (2021)
United States v. Texas (2021) is a U.S. Supreme Court case challenging the constitutionality and enforcement mechanism of Texas’s restrictive abortion law known as Senate Bill 8.
-
B.
Washington v. Texas
Washington v. Texas is a 1967 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held criminal defendants have a constitutional right to obtain testimony from favorable witnesses, incorporating the Compulsory Process Clause against the states.
-
C.
Texas v. White
Texas v. White was an 1869 U.S. Supreme Court case that held the Union to be indestructible and that states could not unilaterally secede from it.
-
D.
United States v. Texas (1896)
United States v. Texas (1896) was a U.S. Supreme Court case that addressed a boundary dispute involving the State of Texas and the federal government over territory along what is now the Texas–Oklahoma state line.
-
E.
California v. Texas
California v. Texas is a U.S. Supreme Court case that challenged the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act after Congress reduced the individual mandate penalty to zero.
- F. None of above. chosen
Referenced by (1)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.
subject surface form:
Donald B. Verrilli Jr.