Borel–Kolmogorov paradox
E1116058
UNEXPLORED
The Borel–Kolmogorov paradox is a famous example in probability theory showing that conditional probabilities on events of measure zero can be ambiguous without specifying the underlying limiting procedure or σ-algebra.
All labels observed (2)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| Borel–Kolmogorov paradox canonical | 1 |
| Borel’s paradox | 1 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T14704224 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Borel–Kolmogorov paradox Context triple: [Émile Borel, notableWork, Borel–Kolmogorov paradox]
-
A.
Kolmogorov zero–one law
The Kolmogorov zero–one law is a fundamental result in probability theory stating that certain events determined by the tail behavior of independent random variables must have probability either zero or one.
-
B.
Mazurkiewicz–Sierpiński paradox
The Mazurkiewicz–Sierpiński paradox is a result in set-theoretic geometry showing that a sphere can be decomposed and reassembled in a counterintuitive way, illustrating the existence of paradoxical decompositions similar to the Banach–Tarski paradox.
-
C.
Kolmogorov axioms
The Kolmogorov axioms are the standard mathematical foundation of probability theory, formalizing probabilities as measures on a sigma-algebra that satisfy non-negativity, normalization, and countable additivity.
-
D.
Banach–Tarski paradox
The Banach–Tarski paradox is a theorem in set-theoretic geometry stating that a solid ball in 3‑dimensional space can be decomposed into finitely many non-measurable pieces and reassembled into two identical copies of the original ball, highlighting counterintuitive consequences of the axiom of choice.
-
E.
St. Petersburg paradox
The St. Petersburg paradox is a famous problem in probability theory and economics that highlights how a lottery with an infinite expected payoff can still attract only a finite price from rational gamblers, challenging traditional notions of expected value and decision-making under risk.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Borel–Kolmogorov paradox Target entity description: The Borel–Kolmogorov paradox is a famous example in probability theory showing that conditional probabilities on events of measure zero can be ambiguous without specifying the underlying limiting procedure or σ-algebra.
-
A.
Kolmogorov zero–one law
The Kolmogorov zero–one law is a fundamental result in probability theory stating that certain events determined by the tail behavior of independent random variables must have probability either zero or one.
-
B.
Mazurkiewicz–Sierpiński paradox
The Mazurkiewicz–Sierpiński paradox is a result in set-theoretic geometry showing that a sphere can be decomposed and reassembled in a counterintuitive way, illustrating the existence of paradoxical decompositions similar to the Banach–Tarski paradox.
-
C.
Kolmogorov axioms
The Kolmogorov axioms are the standard mathematical foundation of probability theory, formalizing probabilities as measures on a sigma-algebra that satisfy non-negativity, normalization, and countable additivity.
-
D.
Banach–Tarski paradox
The Banach–Tarski paradox is a theorem in set-theoretic geometry stating that a solid ball in 3‑dimensional space can be decomposed into finitely many non-measurable pieces and reassembled into two identical copies of the original ball, highlighting counterintuitive consequences of the axiom of choice.
-
E.
St. Petersburg paradox
The St. Petersburg paradox is a famous problem in probability theory and economics that highlights how a lottery with an infinite expected payoff can still attract only a finite price from rational gamblers, challenging traditional notions of expected value and decision-making under risk.
- F. None of above. chosen
Referenced by (2)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.
this entity surface form:
Borel’s paradox