Gasperini v. Center for Humanities, Inc.
E1091410
UNEXPLORED
Gasperini v. Center for Humanities, Inc. is a 1996 U.S. Supreme Court decision that refined how federal courts sitting in diversity apply state law standards for reviewing jury awards, thereby further shaping the modern Erie doctrine.
All labels observed (1)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| Gasperini v. Center for Humanities, Inc. canonical | 1 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T14311825 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Gasperini v. Center for Humanities, Inc. Context triple: [Erie doctrine, clarifiedByCase, Gasperini v. Center for Humanities, Inc.]
-
A.
Argersinger v. Hamlin
Argersinger v. Hamlin is a 1972 U.S. Supreme Court case that extended the right to counsel to defendants in misdemeanor cases that may result in imprisonment.
-
B.
Fitzpatrick v. Bitzer
Fitzpatrick v. Bitzer is a 1976 U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that Congress may, under its Fourteenth Amendment enforcement powers, authorize private lawsuits for money damages against state governments despite Eleventh Amendment sovereign immunity.
-
C.
Cannon v. University of Chicago
Cannon v. University of Chicago is a landmark 1979 U.S. Supreme Court case that recognized an implied private right of action for individuals to sue under Title IX for sex discrimination in federally funded education programs.
-
D.
Hensley v. Eckerhart
Hensley v. Eckerhart is a landmark 1983 U.S. Supreme Court decision that established the modern standard for determining reasonable attorney’s fee awards for prevailing parties in civil rights litigation.
-
E.
Ex parte Garland
Ex parte Garland is an 1867 U.S. Supreme Court decision that limited Congress’s power to impose loyalty oaths and affirmed presidential pardon authority in the post–Civil War era.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Gasperini v. Center for Humanities, Inc. Target entity description: Gasperini v. Center for Humanities, Inc. is a 1996 U.S. Supreme Court decision that refined how federal courts sitting in diversity apply state law standards for reviewing jury awards, thereby further shaping the modern Erie doctrine.
-
A.
Argersinger v. Hamlin
Argersinger v. Hamlin is a 1972 U.S. Supreme Court case that extended the right to counsel to defendants in misdemeanor cases that may result in imprisonment.
-
B.
Fitzpatrick v. Bitzer
Fitzpatrick v. Bitzer is a 1976 U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that Congress may, under its Fourteenth Amendment enforcement powers, authorize private lawsuits for money damages against state governments despite Eleventh Amendment sovereign immunity.
-
C.
Cannon v. University of Chicago
Cannon v. University of Chicago is a landmark 1979 U.S. Supreme Court case that recognized an implied private right of action for individuals to sue under Title IX for sex discrimination in federally funded education programs.
-
D.
Hensley v. Eckerhart
Hensley v. Eckerhart is a landmark 1983 U.S. Supreme Court decision that established the modern standard for determining reasonable attorney’s fee awards for prevailing parties in civil rights litigation.
-
E.
Ex parte Garland
Ex parte Garland is an 1867 U.S. Supreme Court decision that limited Congress’s power to impose loyalty oaths and affirmed presidential pardon authority in the post–Civil War era.
- F. None of above. chosen
Referenced by (1)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.