Ex parte Crow Dog

Target entity: Ex parte Crow Dog
Context triple: [United States v. Kagama, precededBy, Ex parte Crow Dog]

• A. Tee-Hit-Ton Indians v. United States
  Tee-Hit-Ton Indians v. United States is a 1955 U.S. Supreme Court case that denied compensable property rights to an Alaska Native group by relying on the Doctrine of Discovery to limit Indigenous land claims.
• B. Standing Bear v. Crook
  Standing Bear v. Crook was an 1879 U.S. federal court case in which Ponca chief Standing Bear successfully argued that Native Americans are "persons" under the law and entitled to habeas corpus rights.
• C. McGirt v. Oklahoma
  McGirt v. Oklahoma is a landmark 2020 U.S. Supreme Court decision that affirmed much of eastern Oklahoma remains Native American reservation land for purposes of federal criminal jurisdiction.
• D. Osage Nation Courts
  Osage Nation Courts are the judicial branch of the Osage Nation, responsible for interpreting and applying tribal law and administering justice within the Osage reservation.
• E. Cherokee Nation v. Georgia
  Cherokee Nation v. Georgia was an 1831 U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the Cherokee Nation was a "domestic dependent nation" lacking standing to sue as a foreign nation, a ruling that shaped federal Indian law and the context of Indian Removal.
• F. None of above. chosen
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Target entity: Ex parte Crow Dog
Target entity description: Ex parte Crow Dog is an 1883 U.S. Supreme Court case that affirmed tribal sovereignty by holding that federal courts lacked jurisdiction over crimes committed by one Native American against another on tribal land.

• A. Tee-Hit-Ton Indians v. United States
  Tee-Hit-Ton Indians v. United States is a 1955 U.S. Supreme Court case that denied compensable property rights to an Alaska Native group by relying on the Doctrine of Discovery to limit Indigenous land claims.
• B. Standing Bear v. Crook
  Standing Bear v. Crook was an 1879 U.S. federal court case in which Ponca chief Standing Bear successfully argued that Native Americans are "persons" under the law and entitled to habeas corpus rights.
• C. McGirt v. Oklahoma
  McGirt v. Oklahoma is a landmark 2020 U.S. Supreme Court decision that affirmed much of eastern Oklahoma remains Native American reservation land for purposes of federal criminal jurisdiction.
• D. Osage Nation Courts
  Osage Nation Courts are the judicial branch of the Osage Nation, responsible for interpreting and applying tribal law and administering justice within the Osage reservation.
• E. Cherokee Nation v. Georgia
  Cherokee Nation v. Georgia was an 1831 U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the Cherokee Nation was a "domestic dependent nation" lacking standing to sue as a foreign nation, a ruling that shaped federal Indian law and the context of Indian Removal.
• F. None of above. chosen