Dissent in United States v. Windsor
GPTKB entity
Statements (51)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
| gptkbp:case_types |
gptkb:United_States_v._Windsor
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
| gptkbp:date |
June 26, 2013
|
| gptkbp:dissenting_opinion |
gptkb:Judicial_review
gptkb:Chief_Justice_John_Roberts gptkb:Justice_Antonin_Scalia gptkb:Constitution gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States gptkb:Justice_Samuel_Alito gptkb:Separation_of_powers Critical State sovereignty Constitutional debates Judicial activism Judicial restraint Role of the judiciary Constitutional limits on federal power Public opinion on marriage Judicial activism vs. restraint Legal ramifications of the ruling Constitutional law principles Impact on future cases Public policy considerations 35 pages Federalism concerns Cultural implications of marriage Constitutional interpretation methods Affirm DOMA's constitutionality Federal vs. state jurisdiction Future of marriage laws Historical context of marriage Legal challenges to DOMA Legal interpretations of marriage Legal precedent for same-sex marriage Legislative intent of DOMA Marriage as a state issue Role of the Supreme Court Social implications of the ruling State laws on marriage Traditional marriage definition |
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Dissent in United States v. Windsor
|
| gptkbp:impact |
Same-sex marriage rights
|
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
gptkb:Defense_of_Marriage_Act_(DOMA)
|
| gptkbp:outcome |
Struck down Section 3 of DOMA
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
gptkb:United_States_v._Lopez
gptkb:Lawrence_v._Texas |
| gptkbp:public_perception |
gptkb:Justice_Anthony_Kennedy
|
| gptkbp:significance |
Constitutional interpretation
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
3
|