Dissent in Trump v. Mazars USA, LLP
GPTKB entity
Statements (49)
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:legal_case
|
gptkbp:argued_on |
May 12, 2020
|
gptkbp:case_number |
No. 19-715
|
gptkbp:court |
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court
|
gptkbp:date |
gptkb:2020
|
gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
July 9, 2020 |
gptkbp:dissent_impact |
future executive actions
Congress's investigative powers |
gptkbp:dissenting_opinion |
gptkb:Justice_Brett_Kavanaugh
gptkb:Justice_Neil_Gorsuch gptkb:Justice_Samuel_Alito gptkb:Justice_Clarence_Thomas broad interpretation of executive power executive privilege erosion limitations on congressional authority need for checks on executive need for judicial restraint overreach of congressional power protection of executive functions |
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Dissent in Trump v. Mazars USA, LLP
|
gptkbp:impact |
presidential accountability
future subpoenas |
gptkbp:involves |
gptkb:Donald_Trump
gptkb:Mazars_USA,_LLP |
gptkbp:legal_context |
gptkb:Trump's_presidency
financial investigations Congressional subpoenas |
gptkbp:legal_issue |
subpoena enforcement
|
gptkbp:majority_argument |
balance of powers
legitimate legislative purpose presidential records are subject to oversight |
gptkbp:majority_concerns |
executive overreach
presidential accountability |
gptkbp:majority_conclusion |
upholding congressional authority
|
gptkbp:majority_impact |
limiting presidential claims of immunity
strengthening congressional authority |
gptkbp:outcome |
split decision
|
gptkbp:precedent |
separation of powers
|
gptkbp:public_perception |
gptkb:Chief_Justice_John_Roberts
gptkb:Justice_Elena_Kagan gptkb:Justice_Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg gptkb:Justice_Sonia_Sotomayor |
gptkbp:related_to |
Congressional oversight
financial records executive privilege |
gptkbp:significance |
presidential immunity
|
gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer |
3
|