Dissent in Shelby County v. Holder

GPTKB entity

Statements (43)
Predicate Object
gptkbp:instanceOf Legal Opinion
gptkbp:associated_with Justice_Ginsburg's_legacy
gptkbp:author gptkb:Justice_Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg
gptkbp:callsFor continued protection of voting rights
lawmakers and citizens
ongoing voter suppression issues
gptkbp:citedBy previous_Supreme_Court_decisions
gptkbp:claims Congress's_authority_to_regulate_elections
gptkbp:controversy Voting_Rights_Act_is_still_necessary
gptkbp:criticism majority opinion
judicial restraint
gptkbp:dislikes with the majority's interpretation
gptkbp:emphasizes importance of federal oversight
gptkbp:has a warning against complacency
gptkbp:highlights history of racial discrimination
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label Dissent in Shelby County v. Holder
gptkbp:influence civil rights advocacy
gptkbp:is_a_document_that future legal cases
shapes public opinion on voting rights.
gptkbp:is_a_key_component_of voting rights litigation
gptkbp:is_a_reflection_of the judicial climate of its time
gptkbp:is_essential_for understanding voting rights history
gptkbp:is_featured_in a critical perspective on voting rights
gptkbp:is_part_of the ongoing struggle for civil rights
the broader conversation on race and law
the legal discourse on federalism
the legal framework surrounding elections
Supreme_Court_case_law
gptkbp:is_referenced_in civil rights organizations
gptkbp:is_studied_in legal scholarship
gptkbp:is_supported_by arguments for stronger voting protections
gptkbp:is_used_in media coverage of voting rights
subsequent voting rights discussions
legal_arguments
gptkbp:issues gptkb:Section_5_of_the_Voting_Rights_Act
gptkbp:notableFeature gptkb:Shelby_County_v._Holder
gptkbp:publishedBy official court documents
gptkbp:reflects judicial_philosophy_of_Justice_Ginsburg
gptkbp:related_to current voting legislation debates
gptkbp:released impact on minority voters
gptkbp:state preclearance is a valid measure
gptkbp:suitableFor the need for legislative action
gptkbp:was_a_response_to the majority ruling