Statements (59)
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:government_policies
|
gptkbp:case_types |
gptkb:Bush_v._Gore
|
gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
gptkbp:dissenting_opinion |
noted the importance of public confidence in elections
highlighted the need for consistency in judicial rulings advocated for the protection of the electoral process questioned the legitimacy of the majority's reasoning expressed concern over the Court's role in democracy warned against the erosion of civil rights through judicial decisions suggested that the decision undermined the electoral process advocated for the rights of voters advocated for transparency in electoral processes argued against the majority decision argued for the necessity of a fair recount process argued for the necessity of a recount argued that the decision was politically motivated argued that the majority misapplied the law called for a commitment to democratic values called for a more equitable electoral process called for a recount of votes called for adherence to democratic principles called for judicial restraint criticized the lack of uniform standards emphasized equal protection concerns emphasized the need for judicial accountability highlighted the importance of state election laws highlighted the need for clear voting standards highlighted the potential for disenfranchisement noted the historical significance of the case noted the implications for future elections noted the importance of upholding the rule of law noted the potential for future electoral chaos emphasized the role of the judiciary in protecting democracy stressed the importance of judicial independence stressed the need for a fair electoral process warned against the politicization of the judiciary expressed skepticism about the majority's conclusions expressed concern over the implications for future governance argued for the necessity of a transparent electoral process called for a more thorough examination of the facts stressed the importance of protecting minority rights emphasized the role of the judiciary in safeguarding elections emphasized the importance of public participation in democracy called for a more principled approach to election law suggested that the ruling could lead to voter suppression warned against undermining public trust in the judiciary |
gptkbp:historical_context |
occurred during the 2000 United States presidential election
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Dissent in Bush v. Gore
|
gptkbp:impact |
influenced future election law cases
|
gptkbp:judicial_review |
gptkb:Stephen_Breyer
gptkb:Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg gptkb:David_Souter gptkb:John_Paul_Stevens |
gptkbp:precedent |
set a controversial precedent for election disputes
|
gptkbp:public_perception |
decided by a 5-4 vote
|
gptkbp:significance |
highlighted judicial intervention in elections
|
gptkbp:year |
gptkb:2000
|
gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg
|
gptkbp:bfsLayer |
3
|