Statements (57)
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
gptkbp:caseTypes |
2020-12345
available in legal databases |
gptkbp:citedBy |
123 Va. 456
|
gptkbp:community_engagement |
mixed responses
|
gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Supreme_Court
insufficient evidence strict scrutiny unanimous ruling published in legal journals based on constitutional interpretation |
gptkbp:date |
March 15, 2020
April 20, 2020 |
gptkbp:doctrine |
due process
double jeopardy |
gptkbp:historicalEvent |
part_of_Virginia_legal_history
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Davis v. Commonwealth
|
gptkbp:impact |
influenced subsequent rulings
influenced state laws |
gptkbp:influence |
affects defendants' rights
|
gptkbp:is_involved_in |
gptkb:Commonwealth_of_Virginia
Davis |
gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Justice_Smith
published three judges subject to appeal |
gptkbp:jurisdiction |
gptkb:Virginia
|
gptkbp:legal_principle |
criminal law
|
gptkbp:legal_representation |
widely discussed
Public Defender State Attorney General |
gptkbp:legalStatus |
constitutional law
recorded part of broader legal trends |
gptkbp:media_coverage |
extensive
|
gptkbp:notableFeature |
landmark decision
affects sentencing guidelines summary available online analyzed in legal textbooks affects future legal interpretations available in court archives contributes to body of case law |
gptkbp:outcome |
affirmed
upheld lower court's decision precedent for similar cases |
gptkbp:politicalParty |
Justice_Johnson
|
gptkbp:precedent |
established legal principles
cited in future cases |
gptkbp:public_perception |
controversial
|
gptkbp:regulatoryCompliance |
debated implications
|
gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:Johnson_v._Commonwealth
gptkb:Smith_v._Commonwealth |
gptkbp:research |
witness testimonies
forensic_analysis |
gptkbp:significance |
impact on criminal procedure
|
gptkbp:tactics |
overwhelming evidence
|
gptkbp:year |
2020
|