Properties (55)
Predicate | Object |
---|---|
gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
gptkbp:area |
criminal law
|
gptkbp:caseOutcome |
constitutional law
legal textbooks law reviews legal seminars constitutional debates legal blogs legal_arguments |
gptkbp:caseTypes |
criminal procedure
evidence law reforms 03-02-00 |
gptkbp:citedBy |
court opinions
|
gptkbp:controversy |
November 10, 2003
|
gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Justice_Scalia
Confrontation Clause interpretation admissibility of hearsay |
gptkbp:date |
2004
|
gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:Supreme_Court
March 8, 2004 |
gptkbp:doctrine |
hearsay rule
|
gptkbp:examinationType |
criminal trial
hearsay evidence |
gptkbp:has_a_role_in |
legal precedent
legal scholarship |
gptkbp:has_implications_for |
fair trial rights
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Crawford vs. Spence
|
gptkbp:impact |
judicial discretion
witness testimony rules evidence law criminal defendants' rights defendant's rights advocacy. |
gptkbp:influence |
defense strategies
appellate court decisions |
gptkbp:influenced |
subsequent cases
law school curricula |
gptkbp:involves |
Spence
Crawford |
gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Justice_Thomas
|
gptkbp:jurisdiction |
gptkb:United_States
|
gptkbp:legal_principle |
right to confront witnesses
testimonial vs. non-testimonial statements |
gptkbp:legal_representation |
public defender
private attorney |
gptkbp:legalStatus |
due process
|
gptkbp:notableFeature |
gptkb:Crawford_v._Washington
541 U.S. 36 future trials law_enforcement_practices |
gptkbp:outcome |
reversed conviction
Crawford's_statement_excluded |
gptkbp:precedent |
testimonial evidence
|
gptkbp:reform |
evidence admission standards
|
gptkbp:related_to |
Sixth Amendment
|
gptkbp:significance |
Confrontation Clause
|