Chevron U. S. A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.
GPTKB entity
Statements (67)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:legal_case
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
4
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:West_Virginia_v._Environmental_Protection_Agency
gptkb:U._S._Court_of_Appeals_for_the_D._C._Circuit gptkb:Kisor_v._Wilkie gptkb:U._S._Court_of_Appeals_for_the_District_of_Columbia_Circuit |
| gptkbp:case_types |
administrative law case
debated in legal and political circles. documented in legal analyses. documented in legal textbooks. originated from a challenge to EPA regulations. summarized in legal reviews. summary available in legal databases. supported by proponents of regulatory flexibility. |
| gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:legal_case
June 25, 1984 |
| gptkbp:docket_number |
No. 82-1005
|
| gptkbp:historical_debate |
March 1, 1984
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Chevron U. S. A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.
|
| gptkbp:impact |
influenced administrative law.
|
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
467 U. S. 837
cited in numerous legal cases. frequently cited in legal opinions. |
| gptkbp:is_involved_in |
gptkb:Natural_Resources_Defense_Council,_Inc.
gptkb:Chevron_U._S._A.,_Inc. |
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
gptkb:United_States_federal_law
|
| gptkbp:legacy |
established a framework for judicial review.
|
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
Chevron two-step test.
context of U. S. environmental policy. context of environmental law. interpretation of the Clean Air Act regulatory authority of federal agencies. |
| gptkbp:notable_event |
gptkb:National_Cable_&_Telecommunications_Ass'n_v._Brand_X_Internet_Services
gptkb:Auer_v._Robbins gptkb:United_States_v._Mead_Corp. |
| gptkbp:outcome |
often studied in law schools.
discussed in legal forums. remains relevant in discussions of administrative authority. remains relevant in administrative law discussions. Court ruled in favor of Chevron. important for defining the scope of judicial review of agency interpretations. analyzed for its impact on agency power. considered a landmark case in administrative law. criticized for giving too much power to agencies. critiqued for its broad interpretation. evaluated for its legal reasoning. impact on future regulatory cases. implications for environmental regulation. implications for federal regulatory authority. implications for judicial review. influenced subsequent environmental policy. shaped future cases involving agency regulations. significant for environmental law. studied in administrative law courses. the Court deferred to the agency's interpretation. upheld the EPA's authority. upheld the EPA's interpretation. analyzed for its implications on agency discretion. analyzed the role of courts in reviewing agency actions. |
| gptkbp:precedent |
established principles for administrative agency interpretation.
|
| gptkbp:public_perception |
gptkb:Justice_Antonin_Scalia
gptkb:Justice_Byron_White gptkb:Justice_John_Paul_Stevens gptkb:Justice_William_H._Rehnquist gptkb:Justice_Sandra_Day_O'_Connor |
| gptkbp:resolution |
resolved by the Supreme Court.
|
| gptkbp:significance |
Chevron deference
|