Chevron U. S. A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.
GPTKB entity
Statements (67)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:legal_case
|
| gptkbp:argued_on |
March 1, 1984
|
| gptkbp:case_analysis |
often studied in law schools.
discussed in legal forums. remains relevant in discussions of administrative authority. remains relevant in administrative law discussions. analyzed for its impact on agency power. criticized for giving too much power to agencies. critiqued for its broad interpretation. evaluated for its legal reasoning. implications for environmental regulation. implications for federal regulatory authority. implications for judicial review. studied in administrative law courses. analyzed for its implications on agency discretion. analyzed the role of courts in reviewing agency actions. |
| gptkbp:case_debate |
debated in legal and political circles.
|
| gptkbp:case_number |
documented in legal analyses.
documented in legal textbooks. originated from a challenge to EPA regulations. summarized in legal reviews. summary available in legal databases. |
| gptkbp:case_outcome |
impact on future regulatory cases.
influenced subsequent environmental policy. shaped future cases involving agency regulations. the Court deferred to the agency's interpretation. upheld the EPA's authority. upheld the EPA's interpretation. |
| gptkbp:case_significance |
important for defining the scope of judicial review of agency interpretations.
considered a landmark case in administrative law. significant for environmental law. |
| gptkbp:case_types |
administrative law case
supported by proponents of regulatory flexibility. |
| gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
June 25, 1984 |
| gptkbp:dissenting_opinion |
gptkb:Justice_Antonin_Scalia
gptkb:Justice_Byron_White gptkb:Justice_William_H._Rehnquist gptkb:Justice_Sandra_Day_O'_Connor |
| gptkbp:docket_number |
No. 82-1005
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Chevron U. S. A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.
|
| gptkbp:impact |
influenced administrative law.
|
| gptkbp:involved_parties |
gptkb:Natural_Resources_Defense_Council,_Inc.
gptkb:Chevron_U._S._A.,_Inc. |
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
467 U. S. 837
cited in numerous legal cases. frequently cited in legal opinions. |
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
gptkb:United_States_federal_law
|
| gptkbp:legacy |
established a framework for judicial review.
|
| gptkbp:legal_context |
context of U. S. environmental policy.
context of environmental law. regulatory authority of federal agencies. |
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
interpretation of the Clean Air Act
|
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
Chevron two-step test.
|
| gptkbp:outcome |
Court ruled in favor of Chevron.
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
established principles for administrative agency interpretation.
|
| gptkbp:public_perception |
gptkb:Justice_John_Paul_Stevens
|
| gptkbp:related_cases |
gptkb:National_Cable_&_Telecommunications_Ass'n_v._Brand_X_Internet_Services
gptkb:Auer_v._Robbins gptkb:United_States_v._Mead_Corp. |
| gptkbp:resolution |
resolved by the Supreme Court.
|
| gptkbp:significance |
Chevron deference
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:West_Virginia_v._Environmental_Protection_Agency
gptkb:U._S._Court_of_Appeals_for_the_D._C._Circuit gptkb:Kisor_v._Wilkie gptkb:U._S._Court_of_Appeals_for_the_District_of_Columbia_Circuit |
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
4
|