Statements (58)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
2010/0001
|
| gptkbp:consequences |
police procedures
|
| gptkbp:controversy |
surrounding interrogation rights
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_Kingdom
affirmed rights ensured protection upheld fundamental rights |
| gptkbp:date |
2010-10-26
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
2010
|
| gptkbp:gameFeatures |
gptkb:David_Cadder
|
| gptkbp:homeGround |
arose from a criminal conviction
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Cadder v. HM Advocate
|
| gptkbp:impact |
criminal justice system
on public policy Scottish_legal_system |
| gptkbp:influence |
for future legislation
|
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Lord_Phillips
gptkb:Lord_Clarke gptkb:Lord_Kerr gptkb:Lord_Brown gptkb:Lord_Dyson majority decision Lord Hope of_police_practices |
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
gptkb:Scotland
|
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
right to legal representation
self-incrimination |
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
human rights law
access to a lawyer before police questioning critical for fair trial |
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
gptkb:European_Convention_on_Human_Rights
Scots law for interrogation procedures |
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
constitutional law
landmark ruling rights of the accused for future cases for law enforcement influenced subsequent rulings in law schools for legal education in legal history involved serious charges [2010] UKSC 43 in legal textbooks to human rights advocacy |
| gptkbp:outcome |
overturned conviction
retrial ordered reaffirmed legal standards set a new standard |
| gptkbp:precedent |
right to counsel
legal rights during detention |
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:Salduz_v._Turkey
|
| gptkbp:respondsTo |
HM Advocate
|
| gptkbp:significance |
impact on police interrogation practices
|
| gptkbp:soundtrack |
2010-06-30
|