Statements (29)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:caseOutcome |
Defendant's conviction overturned
|
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
Criminal law
09-78 |
| gptkbp:citedBy |
131 S. Ct. 2705
|
| gptkbp:consequences |
State evidentiary rules
|
| gptkbp:court |
5-4 decision
Defendant's rights were violated Strengthened_the_Confrontation_Clause_protections |
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:United_States_Supreme_Court
June 23, 2011 |
| gptkbp:filedIn |
April 20, 2011
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Bullcoming v. New Mexico
|
| gptkbp:impact |
Confrontation_rights_in_criminal_trials
|
| gptkbp:involved |
State of New Mexico
Bullcoming |
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Justice_Antonin_Scalia
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States Justices_Samuel_Alito,_John_Roberts,_Anthony_Kennedy,_and_Clarence_Thomas |
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
Sixth Amendment
Confrontation Clause Impact on the admissibility of forensic lab reports |
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
Clarified_the_application_of_the_Confrontation_Clause_to_forensic_evidence.
|
| gptkbp:outcome |
Reversed_the_New_Mexico_Supreme_Court's_decision
|
| gptkbp:politicalParty |
gptkb:Justice_Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
gptkb:Crawford_v._Washington
subsequent cases involving forensic evidence |
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:Melendez-Diaz_v._Massachusetts
|
| gptkbp:relatedTo |
forensic evidence
|