|
gptkbp:instance_of
|
gptkb:legal_case
|
|
gptkbp:alleged
|
trade dress infringement
|
|
gptkbp:appeals_to
|
gptkb:Mattel
|
|
gptkbp:case_analysis
|
gptkb:Ethics
|
|
gptkbp:challenges
|
gptkb:Mattel
|
|
gptkbp:ended
|
gptkb:2018
|
|
gptkbp:governed_by
|
gptkb:California_courts
|
|
gptkbp:has_a_focus_on
|
public interest
|
|
gptkbp:highlights
|
copyright law
|
|
https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label
|
Bratz lawsuit
|
|
gptkbp:included
|
counterclaims
|
|
gptkbp:influenced
|
future toy designs
|
|
gptkbp:involved
|
licensing agreements
celebrity endorsements
trade secrets
trade dress infringement
trademark infringement
consumer reactions
|
|
gptkbp:involves
|
gptkb:MGA_Entertainment
gptkb:Mattel
|
|
gptkbp:is_a_moment_of
|
Bratz brand
|
|
gptkbp:is_a_subject_of
|
gptkb:academic_research
gptkb:documentaries
media analysis
|
|
gptkbp:is_about
|
doll design
|
|
gptkbp:is_affected_by
|
Bratz sales
|
|
gptkbp:is_analyzed_in
|
lawyers
|
|
gptkbp:is_applied_in
|
gptkb:2004
|
|
gptkbp:is_discussed_in
|
gptkb:podcasts
legal journals
|
|
gptkbp:is_focused_on
|
design similarities
|
|
gptkbp:is_referenced_in
|
business studies
|
|
gptkbp:is_related_to
|
design patents
|
|
gptkbp:is_significant_for
|
toy industry
|
|
gptkbp:issues
|
gptkb:intellectual_property
|
|
gptkbp:landmark
|
gptkb:Barbie
|
|
gptkbp:led_to
|
Bratz brand expansion
|
|
gptkbp:legal_issue
|
celebrity culture
|
|
gptkbp:notable_event
|
pop culture history
toy collectors
|
|
gptkbp:notable_examples
|
brand protection
|
|
gptkbp:precedent
|
future cases
|
|
gptkbp:reported_by
|
gptkb:media_outlets
|
|
gptkbp:resulted_in
|
gptkb:Roman_settlement
financial damages
|
|
gptkbp:started_in
|
gptkb:2004
|
|
gptkbp:was_a_case_involving
|
artistic expression
|
|
gptkbp:was_a_case_that_examined
|
the role of design in branding
|
|
gptkbp:was_a_catalyst_for
|
new regulations
|
|
gptkbp:was_a_dispute_about
|
market share
|
|
gptkbp:was_a_legal_battle_over
|
doll aesthetics
|
|
gptkbp:was_a_legal_conflict_between
|
two major companies
|
|
gptkbp:was_a_legal_matter_that_involved
|
consumer rights.
|
|
gptkbp:was_a_significant_legal_issue_in
|
the 2000s
|
|
gptkbp:was_a_turning_point_for
|
gptkb:MGA_Entertainment
|
|
gptkbp:was_characterized_by
|
high-profile attorneys
|
|
gptkbp:was_filed_against
|
gptkb:Mattel
|
|
gptkbp:was_filed_by
|
gptkb:MGA_Entertainment
|
|
gptkbp:was_influenced_by
|
market trends
|
|
gptkbp:was_involved_in
|
creativity in business
corporate rivalry
|
|
gptkbp:was_part_of
|
larger industry disputes
|
|
gptkbp:was_settled_in
|
gptkb:United_States_federal_law
|