Properties (54)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:advocatesFor |
gptkb:United_States_Attorney_General
|
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
No. 1
|
| gptkbp:citedBy |
gptkb:Roe_v._Wade
gptkb:Katz_v._United_States Lower court rulings Subsequent_Supreme_Court_decisions |
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
February 24, 1928 |
| gptkbp:discusses |
Law review articles
Legal textbooks Judicial reviews Legal commentaries Supreme_Court_opinions |
| gptkbp:filedIn |
gptkb:Louis_Brandeis
|
| gptkbp:historicalContext |
Prohibition era
Civil liberties movement Rise of federal law enforcement |
| gptkbp:historicalLegacy |
American_legal_history
Fourth_Amendment_jurisprudence Supreme_Court_jurisprudence |
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Brandeis v. United States
|
| gptkbp:impact |
Legal_interpretations_of_the_Fourth_Amendment
|
| gptkbp:influencedBy |
gptkb:Brandeis's_dissent_in_Olmstead_v._United_States
Privacy advocacy Exclusionary rule Expectation of privacy standard Brandeis's_advocacy_for_civil_liberties Brandeis's_legal_philosophy Brandeis's_views_on_social_justice Progressive_Era_legal_thought |
| gptkbp:judges |
gptkb:Justice_William_O._Douglas
gptkb:Justice_Louis_Brandeis |
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
277 U.S. 478 (1928)
Fourth_Amendment_rights |
| gptkbp:outcome |
Evidence obtained without a warrant is inadmissible
|
| gptkbp:partOf |
Constitutional law
|
| gptkbp:politicalParty |
gptkb:Justice_Oliver_Wendell_Holmes_Jr.
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
Subsequent privacy cases
|
| gptkbp:relatedTo |
gptkb:Louis_D._Brandeis
gptkb:Katz_v._United_States gptkb:United_States_government gptkb:Olmstead_v._United_States Legal precedents Legal reforms Constitutional amendments Civil rights cases Judicial activism Judicial restraint Constitutional challenges Search and seizure laws Federalism debates Legal privacy rights |
| gptkbp:significance |
Established the principle of privacy in legal contexts
|