Statements (93)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
| gptkbp:case_number |
gptkb:No._1
|
| gptkbp:case_outcome |
Reversed lower court ruling
Strengthened Fourth Amendment protections |
| gptkbp:case_types |
Civil rights case
|
| gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
February 24, 1928 |
| gptkbp:dissenting_opinion |
gptkb:Justice_William_O._Douglas
|
| gptkbp:duration |
1928-1930
|
| gptkbp:historical_significance |
Foundation for modern privacy rights
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Brandeis v. United States
|
| gptkbp:impact |
Legal interpretations of the Fourth Amendment
|
| gptkbp:influenced_by |
Progressive Era reforms
|
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
273 U. S. 361
|
| gptkbp:judicial_review |
Constitutional review
|
| gptkbp:legal_context |
Prohibition era
|
| gptkbp:legal_framework |
Influenced future Supreme Court decisions
Judicial activism |
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
Fourth Amendment rights
Warrantless searches are unconstitutional |
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
Expectation of privacy
|
| gptkbp:legislation |
gptkb:Judicial_review
gptkb:Constitution gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States gptkb:United_States_federal_law gptkb:Civil_Rights_Movement gptkb:lawyer gptkb:Christian_theology gptkb:legal_case Legal reform Civil liberties Legal history Legal rights Legal institutions Legal systems Due process Constitutional rights Legal theory Legal challenges Legal frameworks Individual rights Legal ethics Legal precedent Legal interpretation Legal consequences Judicial decisions Legal implications Legal obligations Legal standards Rights of the accused Judicial precedents Legal protections Privacy rights Government power Search and seizure Legal analysis Legal philosophy Legal responsibilities Legal accountability Legal norms Judicial principles Legal protections for citizens Legal principles of justice Search warrant Legal rights of individuals Legal rights to appeal Legal rights to due process Legal rights to fair trial Legal rights to privacy Legal rights to protection from bills of attainder Legal rights to protection from discrimination. Legal rights to protection from double jeopardy Legal rights to protection from ex post facto laws Legal rights to protection from excessive bail Legal rights to protection from self-incrimination Legal rights to protection from unlawful searches Legal rights to representation Legal safeguards Legal standards of conduct Legal structures Legal rights to protection from arbitrary government action Legal rights to protection from cruel and unusual punishment |
| gptkbp:outcome |
Evidence obtained without a warrant is inadmissible
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
Subsequent privacy cases
Set precedent for search and seizure laws |
| gptkbp:public_perception |
gptkb:Justice_Louis_D._Brandeis
|
| gptkbp:related_cases |
gptkb:Katz_v._United_States
gptkb:Olmstead_v._United_States |
| gptkbp:related_to |
gptkb:Louis_D._Brandeis
gptkb:United_States_government |
| gptkbp:significance |
Influential in privacy law
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:Louis_Brandeis
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
4
|