Statements (50)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
civil rights case
117, 2018 |
| gptkbp:citedBy |
2019 OK 12
|
| gptkbp:community_engagement |
high
significant media coverage |
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_Oklahoma
based on constitutional interpretation majority_opinion_favored_Bishop |
| gptkbp:criticism |
argued for state interests
|
| gptkbp:date |
February 2019
|
| gptkbp:decidedBy |
2019
|
| gptkbp:historical_analysis |
widely discussed in law reviews
|
| gptkbp:historicalEvent |
part_of_legal_history_in_Oklahoma
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Bishop v. Oklahoma
|
| gptkbp:impact |
influences judicial decisions
led to changes in state law |
| gptkbp:is_involved_in |
Bishop_and_the_State_of_Oklahoma
|
| gptkbp:judges |
yes
reversed lower court decision three judges |
| gptkbp:keyPeople |
constitutionality of a statute
|
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
due process rights
|
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
extensive commentary
attorneys_for_Bishop attorneys_for_the_State |
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
constitutional law
impact on state law held in 2019 part of broader legal trends |
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
available in legal archives
significant for civil liberties analyzed by legal experts discussed in legal forums summarized in legal databases important for civil rights published in legal journals affects future legislation affects future court rulings relevant to ongoing legal debates part_of_Oklahoma_case_law |
| gptkbp:outcome |
unconstitutional ruling
precedent-setting case statute was found unconstitutional |
| gptkbp:politicalParty |
yes
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
influences future cases
establishes new legal standards |
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
similar constitutional challenges
|
| gptkbp:soundtrack |
January 2019
|
| gptkbp:state |
gptkb:Oklahoma_state_government
|