Baker v. Cincinnati Enquirer
GPTKB entity
Statements (46)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instanceOf |
legal case
|
| gptkbp:appeal |
gptkb:Ohio_Supreme_Court
|
| gptkbp:applicationNumber |
CA2000-01-001
|
| gptkbp:caseTypes |
civil case
|
| gptkbp:community_engagement |
high
|
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Ohio_Court_of_Appeals
majority opinion affirmed lower court's decision protection of speech |
| gptkbp:date |
June 2000
|
| gptkbp:doctrine |
actual malice standard
|
| gptkbp:homeGround |
Baker's_allegations_against_Enquirer
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
Baker v. Cincinnati Enquirer
|
| gptkbp:impact |
journalistic_practices
shaped_defamation_law_in_Ohio |
| gptkbp:is_involved_in |
gptkb:Cincinnati_Enquirer
Baker |
| gptkbp:judges |
none
|
| gptkbp:jurisdiction |
gptkb:Ohio
|
| gptkbp:legal_principle |
defamation
public figure standard |
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
First_Amendment_implications
attorney_for_Baker attorney_for_Cincinnati_Enquirer |
| gptkbp:legalStatus |
freedom of the press
|
| gptkbp:media_coverage |
extensive
|
| gptkbp:notableFeature |
legal textbooks
media accountability influenced future defamation cases set precedent for public figures impact on journalism 2000-Ohio-1950 defamation claim dismissed important in defamation law involved public statements ongoing discussions about press freedom examined_First_Amendment_protections. |
| gptkbp:outcome |
resolved
upheld media rights Baker's_claims_rejected Cincinnati_Enquirer_not_liable favor_of_Cincinnati_Enquirer |
| gptkbp:precedent |
First_Amendment_rights
|
| gptkbp:relatedPatent |
gptkb:New_York_Times_Co._v._Sullivan
|
| gptkbp:significance |
media freedom
|
| gptkbp:year |
2000
|