Statements (55)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| gptkbp:instance_of |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
| gptkbp:argued_on |
December 1, 1936
|
| gptkbp:case_analysis |
Influenced future Supreme Court decisions.
Analyzed the limits of federal intervention. Relevant to discussions on federal authority. |
| gptkbp:case_number |
gptkb:United_States_v._Butler
No. 1. The Supreme Court struck down the Agricultural Adjustment Act. |
| gptkbp:case_outcome |
5-4 ruling.
Influenced the interpretation of the Commerce Clause. Declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court. Significant impact on federalism. Unconstitutional ruling. |
| gptkbp:case_significance |
Highlighted tensions between state and federal powers.
|
| gptkbp:case_types |
Constitutional law case
Economic regulation case. |
| gptkbp:court |
gptkb:Washington,_D._C.
|
| gptkbp:decided_by |
gptkb:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
|
| gptkbp:dissenting_opinion |
gptkb:Justice_William_O._Douglas
gptkb:Justice_Benjamin_N._Cardozo gptkb:Justice_Harlan_F._Stone gptkb:Justice_Louis_D._Brandeis Brandeis's dissent. Cardozo's dissent. Douglas's dissent. Stone's dissent. |
| gptkbp:effective_date |
1937-01-04
|
| gptkbp:historical_significance |
Influenced future agricultural policy.
|
| https://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label |
301 U. S. 1 (1937)
|
| gptkbp:impact |
gptkb:New_Deal_legislation
|
| gptkbp:influenced_by |
New Deal policies.
|
| gptkbp:is_cited_in |
301 U. S. 1
|
| gptkbp:judicial_review |
gptkb:Yes
|
| gptkbp:legacy |
Legacy of limiting federal power.
|
| gptkbp:legal_context |
Great Depression era legislation.
|
| gptkbp:legal_framework |
Judicial restraint.
Limited federal regulatory power. Struck down federal law. |
| gptkbp:legal_issue |
Constitutionality of the Agricultural Adjustment Act
|
| gptkbp:legal_representation |
Examined federal power under the Commerce Clause.
|
| gptkbp:legislation |
gptkb:farmers
|
| gptkbp:material |
Part of the New Deal legislation.
|
| gptkbp:outcome |
The Act was declared unconstitutional.
|
| gptkbp:precedent |
Subsequent agricultural legislation
Yes. Limits on Congress's taxing and spending power. |
| gptkbp:public_perception |
gptkb:Justice_Owen_J._Roberts
|
| gptkbp:related_cases |
gptkb:NLRB_v._Jones_&_Laughlin_Steel_Corp.
gptkb:Wickard_v._Filburn gptkb:United_States_v._Darby_Lumber_Co. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States. |
| gptkbp:related_to |
gptkb:Agricultural_Adjustment_Act_of_1933
|
| gptkbp:significance |
Set a precedent for federal power limits.
|
| gptkbp:bfsParent |
gptkb:National_Labor_Relations_Board_v._Jones_&_Laughlin_Steel_Corporation
|
| gptkbp:bfsLayer |
4
|